Er 1352829 sikker?

1352829 — Nerq Tillidsscore 50.6/100 (Karakter D). Baseret på analyse af 1 tillidsdimensioner vurderes det som har bemærkelsesværdige sikkerhedsproblemer. Sidst opdateret: 2026-04-01.

Brug 1352829 med forsigtighed. 1352829 is a software tool with a Nerq Tillidsscore of 50.6/100 (D), based on 3 independent data dimensions. Det er under den anbefalede tærskel på 70. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-04-01. Maskinlæsbare data (JSON).

Er 1352829 sikker?

FORSIGTIGHED — 1352829 has a Nerq Tillidsscore of 50.6/100 (D). Har moderate tillidssignaler, men viser nogle bekymrende områder, der kræver opmærksomhed. Egnet til udviklingsformål — gennemgå sikkerheds- og vedligeholdelsessignaler før produktionsimplementering.

Sikkerhedsanalyse → {name} privatlivsrapport →

Hvad er 1352829s tillidsscore?

1352829 has a Nerq Tillidsscore of 50.6/100, earning a D grade. This score is based on 1 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.

Overholdelse
100

Hvad er de vigtigste sikkerhedsresultater for 1352829?

1352829's strongest signal is overholdelse at 100/100. No known vulnerabilities have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.

Compliance: 100/100 — covers 52 of 52 jurisdictions

Hvad er 1352829 og hvem vedligeholder det?

Udviklerultratopaz
Kategoriuncategorized
Kildehttps://huggingface.co/ultratopaz/1352829
Protocolshuggingface_hub

Lovgivningsmæssig overholdelse

EU AI Act Risk ClassNot assessed
Compliance Score100/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

What Is 1352829?

1352829 is a software tool in the uncategorized category available on huggingface_full. Nerq Tillidsscore: 51/100 (D).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.

How Nerq Assesses 1352829's Safety

Nerq's Tillidsscore is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how 1352829 performs in each:

The overall Tillidsscore of 50.6/100 (D) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.

Who Should Use 1352829?

1352829 is designed for:

Risk guidance: 1352829 is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.

How to Verify 1352829's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for known vulnerabilities in 1352829's dependency tree.
  3. Anmeldelse permissions — Understand what access 1352829 requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run 1352829 in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=1352829
  6. Gennemgå license — Confirm that 1352829's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with 1352829

When evaluating whether 1352829 is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how 1352829 processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check 1352829's dependency tree for known vulnerabilities. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to 1352829. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If 1352829 connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that 1352829's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using 1352829 in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using 1352829 Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from 1352829 while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how 1352829 is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure 1352829 and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant 1352829 only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to 1352829's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how 1352829 is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid 1352829?

Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding 1352829 in these scenarios:

tillidsscore for

For each scenario, evaluate whether 1352829 50.6/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.

How 1352829 Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among uncategorized tools, the average Tillidsscore is 62/100. 1352829's score of 50.6/100 is below the category average of 62/100.

This suggests that 1352829 trails behind many comparable uncategorized tools. Organizations with strict security requirements should evaluate whether higher-scoring alternatives better meet their needs.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Tillidsscore History

Nerq continuously monitors 1352829 and recalculates its Tillidsscore as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, 1352829's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track 1352829's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=1352829&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of 1352829 are strengthening or weakening over time.

Vigtigste pointer

Ofte stillede spørgsmål

Er 1352829 sikker at bruge?
Brug med forsigtighed. 1352829 has a Nerq Tillidsscore of 50.6/100 (D). Stærkeste signal: overholdelse (100/100). Score baseret på flere tillidsdimensioner.
Hvad er tillidsscoren for 1352829?
1352829: 50.6/100 (D). Score baseret på: flere tillidsdimensioner. Compliance: 100/100. Scorer opdateres, efterhånden som nye data bliver tilgængelige. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=1352829
Hvad er sikrere alternativer til 1352829?
I uncategorized-kategorien, more software tools are being analyzed — kom snart tilbage. 1352829 scorer 50.6/100.
How often is 1352829's safety score updated?
Nerq continuously monitors 1352829 and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Current: 50.6/100 (D), last verified 2026-04-01. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=1352829
Kan jeg bruge 1352829 i et reguleret miljø?
1352829 has not reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Additional due diligence is recommended for regulated environments.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Disclaimer: Nerqs tillidsscorer er automatiserede vurderinger baseret på offentligt tilgængelige signaler. De udgør ikke anbefalinger eller garantier. Foretag altid din egen verificering.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privatliv Policy