Is Weevolve veilig?
Weevolve — Nerq Vertrouwensscore 66.5/100 (C-beoordeling). Op basis van analyse van 5 vertrouwensdimensies wordt het beschouwd als over het algemeen veilig maar met enkele zorgen. Laatst bijgewerkt: 2026-04-01.
Gebruik Weevolve met voorzichtigheid. Weevolve is a software tool met een Nerq Vertrouwensscore van 66.5/100 (C), based on 5 independent data dimensions. Het ligt onder de aanbevolen drempel van 70. Security: 0/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-04-01. Machineleesbare gegevens (JSON).
Is Weevolve veilig?
VOORZICHTIGHEID — Weevolve heeft een Nerq Vertrouwensscore van 66.5/100 (C). Het heeft gematigde vertrouwenssignalen maar toont enkele aandachtspunten. Geschikt voor ontwikkelingsgebruik — controleer beveiligings- en onderhoudssignalen vóór productie-implementatie.
Wat is de vertrouwensscore van Weevolve?
Weevolve heeft een Nerq Vertrouwensscore van 66.5/100, earning a C grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensions including security, maintenance, and community adoption.
Wat zijn de belangrijkste beveiligingsbevindingen voor Weevolve?
Weevolve's strongest signal is naleving at 80/100. No bekende kwetsbaarheden have been detected. It has not yet reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
Wat is Weevolve en wie onderhoudt het?
| Ontwikkelaar | aro-brez |
| Categorie | coding |
| Sterren | 1 |
| Bron | https://github.com/aro-brez/weevolve |
| Frameworks | anthropic |
| Protocols | rest · websocket |
Naleving van regelgeving
| EU AI Act Risk Class | MINIMAL |
| Compliance Score | 80/100 |
| Jurisdictions | Assessed across 52 jurisdictions |
Populaire alternatieven in coding
What Is Weevolve?
Weevolve is a software tool in the coding category: An autonomous agent that evolves through the SEED protocol.. It has 1 GitHub stars. Nerq Vertrouwensscore: 66/100 (C).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.
How Nerq Assesses Weevolve's Safety
Nerq's Vertrouwensscore is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Weevolve performs in each:
- Beveiliging (0/100): Weevolve's security posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, security policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Onderhoud (1/100): Weevolve is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (1/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API documentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (80/100): Weevolve is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdictions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Based on GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Vertrouwensscore of 66.5/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.
Who Should Use Weevolve?
Weevolve is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with coding tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Weevolve is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.
How to Verify Weevolve's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for bekende kwetsbaarheden in Weevolve's dependency tree. - Beoordeling permissions — Understand what access Weevolve requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Weevolve in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=weevolve - Bekijk de license — Confirm that Weevolve's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Weevolve
When evaluating whether Weevolve is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Weevolve processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Weevolve's dependency tree for bekende kwetsbaarheden. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.
Regularly check for updates to Weevolve. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Weevolve connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Weevolve's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Weevolve in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Weevolve and the EU AI Act
Weevolve is classified as Minimal Risk under the EU AI Act. This is the lowest risk category, meaning it faces minimal regulatory requirements. However, transparency obligations still apply.
Nerq's compliance assessment covers 52 jurisdictions worldwide. For organizations deploying AI tools in regulated environments, understanding these classifications is essential for legal compliance.
Best Practices for Using Weevolve Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Weevolve while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Weevolve is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.
Ensure Weevolve and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.
Grant Weevolve only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Weevolve's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Weevolve is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Weevolve?
Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Weevolve in these scenarios:
- Production environments handling sensitive customer data
- Regulated industries (healthcare, finance, government) without additional compliance review
- Mission-critical systems where downtime has significant business impact
For each scenario, evaluate whether Weevolve is 66.5/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.
How Weevolve Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average Vertrouwensscore is 62/100. Weevolve's score of 66.5/100 is above the category average of 62/100.
This positions Weevolve favorably among coding tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensions.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Vertrouwensscore History
Nerq continuously monitors Weevolve and recalculates its Vertrouwensscore as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Weevolve's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Weevolve's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=weevolve&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Weevolve are strengthening or weakening over time.
Weevolve vs Alternatives
In the coding category, Weevolve scores 66.5/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Weevolve vs AutoGPT — Vertrouwensscore: 74.7/100
- Weevolve vs ollama — Vertrouwensscore: 73.8/100
- Weevolve vs langchain — Vertrouwensscore: 86.4/100
Belangrijkste conclusies
- Weevolve has a Vertrouwensscore of 66.5/100 (C) and is not yet Nerq Verified.
- Weevolve shows moderate trust signals. Conduct thorough due diligence before deploying to production environments.
- Among coding tools, Weevolve scores above the category average of 62/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Veelgestelde vragen
Is Weevolve veilig om te gebruiken?
Wat is Weevolve's trust score?
Wat zijn veiligere alternatieven voor Weevolve?
How often is Weevolve's safety score updated?
Kan ik Weevolve gebruiken in een gereguleerde omgeving?
Disclaimer: Nerq-vertrouwensscores zijn geautomatiseerde beoordelingen op basis van openbaar beschikbare signalen. Ze vormen geen aanbeveling of garantie. Voer altijd uw eigen verificatie uit.