Är Featuretools säker?
Featuretools — Nerq Förtroendepoäng 70.6/100 (Betyg B). Baserat på analys av 5 tillitsdimensioner bedöms det som generellt säkert men med vissa farhågor. Senast uppdaterad: 2026-04-03.
Ja, Featuretools är säker att använda. Featuretools is a software tool med ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 70.6/100 (B), based on 5 oberoende datadimensioner. It is recommended for use. Säkerhet: 0/100. Underhåll: 0/100. Popularity: 0/100. Data hämtad från multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Senast uppdaterad: 2026-04-03. Maskinläsbar data (JSON).
Är Featuretools säker?
JA — Featuretools har ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 70.6/100 (B). Uppfyller Nerqs förtroendetröskel med starka signaler inom säkerhet, underhåll och communityanvändning. Recommended for use — se hela rapporten nedan för specifika överväganden.
Vad är Featuretoolss förtroendepoäng?
Featuretools har ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 70.6/100, earning a B grade. This score is based on 5 independently measured dimensioner including säkerhet, underhåll, and communityanvändning.
Vilka är de viktigaste säkerhetsresultaten för Featuretools?
Featuretools's strongest signal is regelefterlevnad at 92/100. No kända sårbarheter have been detected. It meets the Nerq Verified threshold of 70+.
Vad är Featuretools och vem underhåller det?
| Utvecklare | Unknown |
| Kategori | other |
| Stjärnor | 7,614 |
| Källa | https://github.com/alteryx/featuretools |
Regelefterlevnad
| EU AI Act Risk Class | Not assessed |
| Compliance Score | 92/100 |
| Jurisdiktions | Assessed across 52 jurisdiktions |
Populära alternativ inom other
What Is Featuretools?
Featuretools is a software tool in the other category: An open source python library for automated feature engineering. It has 7,614 GitHub stars. Nerq Förtroendepoäng: 71/100 (B).
Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including säkerhet vulnerabilities, underhåll activity, license regelefterlevnad, and communityanvändning.
How Nerq Assesses Featuretools's Safety
Nerq's Förtroendepoäng is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensioner. Here is how Featuretools performs in each:
- Säkerhet (0/100): Featuretools's säkerhet posture is poor. This score factors in known CVEs, dependency vulnerabilities, säkerhet policy presence, and code signing practices.
- Underhåll (0/100): Featuretools is potentially abandoned. We track commit frequency, release cadence, issue response times, and PR merge rates.
- Documentation (0/100): Documentation quality is insufficient. This includes README completeness, API dokumentation, usage examples, and contribution guidelines.
- Compliance (92/100): Featuretools is broadly compliant. Assessed against regulations in 52 jurisdiktions including the EU AI Act, CCPA, and GDPR.
- Community (0/100): Community adoption is limited. Baserad på GitHub stars, forks, download counts, and ecosystem integrations.
The overall Förtroendepoäng of 70.6/100 (B) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This exceeds the Nerq Verified threshold of 70, indicating the tool meets our standards for production use.
Who Should Use Featuretools?
Featuretools is designed for:
- Developers and teams working with other tools
- Organizations evaluating AI tools for their stack
- Researchers exploring AI capabilities in this domain
Risk guidance: Featuretools meets the minimum threshold for production use, but we recommend monitoring for säkerhet advisories and keeping dependencies up to date. Consider implementing additional guardrails for sensitive workloads.
How to Verify Featuretools's Safety Yourself
While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:
- Check the source code — Granska repository's säkerhet policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active underhåll.
- Scan dependencies — Use tools like
npm audit,pip-audit, orsnykto check for kända sårbarheter in Featuretools's dependency tree. - Recension permissions — Understand what access Featuretools requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
- Test in isolation — Run Featuretools in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
- Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks:
GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=alteryx/featuretools - Granska license — Confirm that Featuretools's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
- Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses säkerhet concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.
Common Safety Concerns with Featuretools
When evaluating whether Featuretools is safe, consider these category-specific risks:
Understand how Featuretools processes, stores, and transmits your data. Granska tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.
Check Featuretools's dependency tree for kända sårbarheter. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher säkerhet risk.
Regularly check for updates to Featuretools. Säkerhet patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.
If Featuretools connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.
Verify that Featuretools's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Featuretools in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.
Best Practices for Using Featuretools Safely
Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Featuretools while minimizing risk:
Periodically review how Featuretools is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and regelefterlevnad with your säkerhet policies.
Ensure Featuretools and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from säkerhet patches.
Grant Featuretools only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.
Subscribe to Featuretools's säkerhet advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.
Create and maintain a clear policy for how Featuretools is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.
When Should You Avoid Featuretools?
Even well-trusted tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Featuretools in these scenarios:
- Scenarios where Featuretools's specific capabilities exceed your actual needs — simpler tools may be safer
- Air-gapped environments where the tool cannot receive säkerhet updates
- Projects with strict regulatory requirements that haven't been explicitly validated
For each scenario, evaluate whether Featuretools är 70.6/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. The Nerq Verified status indicates general production readiness, but sector-specific requirements may apply.
How Featuretools Compares to Industry Standards
Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among other tools, the average Förtroendepoäng is 62/100. Featuretools's score of 70.6/100 is above the category average of 62/100.
This positions Featuretools favorably among other tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensioner.
Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks måttlig in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.
Förtroendepoäng History
Nerq continuously monitors Featuretools and recalculates its Förtroendepoäng as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or underhåll patterns change, Featuretools's score is updated within 24 hours.
Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to säkerhet and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced underhåll, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Featuretools's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=alteryx/featuretools&include=history
Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — säkerhet, underhåll, dokumentation, regelefterlevnad, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Featuretools are strengthening or weakening over time.
Featuretools vs Alternativ
In the other category, Featuretools scores 70.6/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:
- Featuretools vs cs-video-courses — Förtroendepoäng: 69.3/100
- Featuretools vs awesome-scalability — Förtroendepoäng: 71.8/100
- Featuretools vs superpowers — Förtroendepoäng: 71.8/100
Viktigaste slutsatser
- Featuretools has a Förtroendepoäng of 70.6/100 (B) and is Nerq Verified.
- Featuretools meets the minimum threshold for production deployment, though monitoring and additional guardrails are recommended.
- Among other tools, Featuretools scores above the category average of 62/100, demonstrating above-average reliability.
- Always verify safety independently — use Nerq's Preflight API for automated, up-to-date trust checks before integration.
Vanliga frågor
Är Featuretools säker att använda?
Vad är Featuretools's trust score?
Vilka säkrare alternativ finns till Featuretools?
How often is Featuretools's safety score updated?
Kan jag använda Featuretools i en reglerad miljö?
Disclaimer: Nerqs förtroendepoäng är automatiserade bedömningar baserade på offentligt tillgängliga signaler. De utgör inte rekommendationer eller garantier. Gör alltid din egen verifiering.