Är Opensync säker?

Använd Opensync med försiktighet. Opensync is a software tool med ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 69.9/100 (C), based on 5 independent data dimensions. Ligger under den rekommenderade gränsen på 70. Security: 0/100. Maintenance: 1/100. Popularity: 1/100. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Last updated: 2026-03-28. Maskinläsbar data (JSON).

Är Opensync säker?

VAR FÖRSIKTIG — Opensync har ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 69.9/100 (C). Har måttliga förtroendesignaler men uppvisar vissa oroande områden. Lämplig för utvecklingsanvändning — granska säkerhets- och underhållssignaler innan produktionsdriftsättning.

Förtroendepoäng i detalj

Säkerhet
0
Regelefterlevnad
100
Underhåll
1
Dokumentation
0
Popularitet
1

Viktiga resultat

Säkerhet score: 0/100 (weak)
Maintenance: 1/100 — low maintenance activity
Compliance: 100/100 — covers 52 of 52 jurisdictions
Documentation: 0/100 — limited documentation
Popularity: 1/100 — 301 stars on github

Detaljer

UtvecklareUnknown
Kategoricoding
Stjärnor301
Källahttps://github.com/waynesutton/opensync

Regelefterlevnad

EU AI Act Risk ClassNot assessed
Compliance Score100/100
JurisdictionsAssessed across 52 jurisdictions

Populära alternativ inom coding

Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT
74.7/100 · B
github
ollama/ollama
73.8/100 · B
github
langchain-ai/langchain
86.4/100 · A
github
x1xhlol/system-prompts-and-models-of-ai-tools
73.8/100 · B
github
anomalyco/opencode
87.9/100 · A
github

What Is Opensync?

Opensync is a software tool in the coding category: Cloud-synced dashboards for OpenCode and Claude Code.. It has 301 GitHub stars. Nerq Förtroendepoäng: 70/100 (C).

Nerq independently analyzes every software tool, app, and extension across multiple trust signals including security vulnerabilities, maintenance activity, license compliance, and community adoption.

How Nerq Assesses Opensync's Safety

Nerq's Förtroendepoäng is calculated from 13+ independent signals aggregated into five dimensions. Here is how Opensync performs in each:

The overall Förtroendepoäng of 69.9/100 (C) reflects the weighted combination of these signals. This is below the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. We recommend additional due diligence before production deployment.

Who Should Use Opensync?

Opensync is designed for:

Risk guidance: Opensync is suitable for development and testing environments. Before production deployment, conduct a thorough review of its security posture, review the specific trust signals above, and consider whether a higher-scored alternative meets your requirements.

How to Verify Opensync's Safety Yourself

While Nerq provides automated trust analysis, we recommend these additional steps before adopting any software tool:

  1. Check the source code — Review the repository's security policy, open issues, and recent commits for signs of active maintenance.
  2. Scan dependencies — Use tools like npm audit, pip-audit, or snyk to check for kända sårbarheter in Opensync's dependency tree.
  3. Recension permissions — Understand what access Opensync requires. Software tools should follow the principle of least privilege.
  4. Test in isolation — Run Opensync in a sandboxed environment before granting access to production data or systems.
  5. Monitor continuously — Use Nerq's API to set up automated trust checks: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=waynesutton/opensync
  6. Granska license — Confirm that Opensync's license is compatible with your intended use case. Pay attention to restrictions on commercial use, redistribution, and derivative works. Some AI tools use dual licensing or have separate terms for enterprise customers that differ from the open-source license.
  7. Check community signals — Look at the project's issue tracker, discussion forums, and social media presence. A healthy community actively reports bugs, contributes fixes, and discusses security concerns openly. Low community engagement may indicate limited peer review of the codebase.

Common Safety Concerns with Opensync

When evaluating whether Opensync is safe, consider these category-specific risks:

Data handling

Understand how Opensync processes, stores, and transmits your data. Review the tool's privacy policy and data retention practices, especially for sensitive or proprietary information.

Dependency security

Check Opensync's dependency tree for kända sårbarheter. Tools with outdated or unmaintained dependencies pose a higher security risk.

Update frequency

Regularly check for updates to Opensync. Security patches and bug fixes are only effective if you're running the latest version.

Third-party integrations

If Opensync connects to external APIs or services, each integration point is a potential attack surface. Audit all third-party connections, verify that data shared with external services is minimized, and ensure that integration credentials are rotated regularly.

License and IP compliance

Verify that Opensync's license is compatible with your intended use case. Some AI tools have restrictive licenses that limit commercial use, redistribution, or derivative works. Using Opensync in violation of its license can expose your organization to legal liability.

Best Practices for Using Opensync Safely

Whether you're an individual developer or an enterprise team, these practices will help you get the most from Opensync while minimizing risk:

Conduct regular audits

Periodically review how Opensync is used in your workflow. Check for unexpected behavior, permissions drift, and compliance with your security policies.

Keep dependencies updated

Ensure Opensync and all its dependencies are running the latest stable versions to benefit from security patches.

Follow least privilege

Grant Opensync only the minimum permissions it needs to function. Avoid granting admin or root access.

Monitor for security advisories

Subscribe to Opensync's security advisories and vulnerability disclosures. Use Nerq's API to get automated trust score updates.

Document usage policies

Create and maintain a clear policy for how Opensync is used within your organization, including data handling guidelines and acceptable use cases.

When Should You Avoid Opensync?

Even promising tools aren't right for every situation. Consider avoiding Opensync in these scenarios:

förtroendepoängen för

For each scenario, evaluate whether Opensync är 69.9/100 meets your organization's risk tolerance. We recommend running a manual security assessment alongside the automated Nerq score.

How Opensync Compares to Industry Standards

Nerq indexes over 6 million software tools, apps, and packages across dozens of categories. Among coding tools, the average Förtroendepoäng is 62/100. Opensync's score of 69.9/100 is above the category average of 62/100.

This positions Opensync favorably among coding tools. While it outperforms the average, there is still room for improvement in certain trust dimensions.

Industry benchmarks matter because they contextualize a tool's safety profile. A score that looks moderate in isolation may actually represent strong performance within a challenging category — or vice versa. Nerq's category-relative analysis helps teams make informed decisions by showing not just absolute quality, but how a tool ranks against its direct peers.

Förtroendepoäng History

Nerq continuously monitors Opensync and recalculates its Förtroendepoäng as new data becomes available. Our scoring engine ingests real-time signals from source repositories, vulnerability databases (NVD, OSV.dev), package registries, and community metrics. When a new CVE is published, a major release ships, or maintenance patterns change, Opensync's score is updated within 24 hours.

Historical trust trends reveal whether a tool is improving, stable, or declining over time. A tool that consistently maintains or improves its score demonstrates ongoing commitment to security and quality. Conversely, a downward trend may signal reduced maintenance, growing technical debt, or unresolved vulnerabilities. To track Opensync's score over time, use the Nerq API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=waynesutton/opensync&include=history

Nerq retains trust score snapshots at regular intervals, enabling trend analysis across weeks and months. Enterprise users can access detailed historical reports showing how each dimension — security, maintenance, documentation, compliance, and community — has evolved independently, providing granular visibility into which aspects of Opensync are strengthening or weakening over time.

Opensync vs Alternatives

In the coding category, Opensync scores 69.9/100. There are higher-scoring alternatives available. For a detailed comparison, see:

Viktigaste slutsatser

Vanliga frågor

Är Opensync säker att använda?
Använd med viss försiktighet. waynesutton/opensync har ett Nerq-förtroendepoäng på 69.9/100 (C). Starkaste signalen: regelefterlevnad (100/100). Poäng baserad på security (0/100), maintenance (1/100), popularity (1/100), documentation (0/100).
Vad är Opensync's trust score?
waynesutton/opensync: 69.9/100 (C). Poäng baserad på: security (0/100), maintenance (1/100), popularity (1/100), documentation (0/100). Compliance: 100/100. Poäng uppdateras när ny data finns tillgänglig. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=waynesutton/opensync
Vilka säkrare alternativ finns till Opensync?
In the coding category, högre betygsatta alternativ inkluderar Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT (75/100), ollama/ollama (74/100), langchain-ai/langchain (86/100). waynesutton/opensync scores 69.9/100.
How often is Opensync's safety score updated?
Nerq continuously monitors Opensync and updates its trust score as new data becomes available. Data sourced from multiple public sources including package registries, GitHub, NVD, OSV.dev, and OpenSSF Scorecard. Current: 69.9/100 (C), last verified 2026-03-28. API: GET nerq.ai/v1/preflight?target=waynesutton/opensync
Kan jag använda Opensync i en reglerad miljö?
Opensync has not reached the Nerq Verified threshold of 70. Additional due diligence is recommended for regulated environments.
API: /v1/preflight Trust Badge API Docs

Disclaimer: Nerqs förtroendepoäng är automatiserade bedömningar baserade på offentligt tillgängliga signaler. De utgör inte rekommendationer eller garantier. Gör alltid din egen verifiering.