citeAgent Alternatives

Safer and better-maintained options, ranked by Nerq Trust Score. Updated 2026-09-11.

citeAgent has a Nerq Trust Score of 56 (D). Automates citation addition in LaTeX papers using AI.

#NameTrustGradeStarsKey Difference
1hiyouga/LlamaFactory84A67.8kHigher trust (84 vs 56); Much larger community
2camel-ai/camel80B16.1kHigher trust (80 vs 56); Much larger community
3inclusionAI/AReaL80B3.6kHigher trust (80 vs 56); Much larger community
4OpenDCAI/Paper2Any80B1.7kHigher trust (80 vs 56); Much larger community
5DLR-RM/rl-baselines3-zoo80B2.7kHigher trust (80 vs 56); Much larger community
6truera/trulens79B3.1kHigher trust (79 vs 56); Much larger community
7xlang-ai/OSWorld78B2.6kHigher trust (78 vs 56); Much larger community
8vamplabAI/sgr-agent-core78B1.0kHigher trust (78 vs 56); Much larger community
954yyyu/zotero-mcp78B1.5kHigher trust (78 vs 56); Much larger community
10unslothai/unsloth77B52.7kHigher trust (77 vs 56); Much larger community
11AIDC-AI/Marco-DeepResearch76B248Higher trust (76 vs 56); Much larger community
12Zettelgarden/Zettelgarden75B166Higher trust (75 vs 56); Much larger community
13AgentR1/Agent-R175B1.2kHigher trust (75 vs 56); Much larger community
14Alibaba-NLP/DeepResearch75B18.2kHigher trust (75 vs 56); Much larger community
15microsoft/RD-Agent75B11.3kHigher trust (75 vs 56); Much larger community

Compare

FAQ

What are the best alternatives to citeAgent?

The top alternatives based on Nerq Trust Score are listed above, all independently evaluated for security and reliability.

Is it safe to switch from citeAgent?

Check each alternative's safety report by clicking its name. Trust scores above 70 indicate strong reliability.

How does Nerq rank citeAgent alternatives?

Alternatives are ranked by Trust Score v2, combining security, maintenance, documentation, and community signals.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy