Cognitive DAST Automation Alternatives

Safer and better-maintained options, ranked by Nerq Trust Score. Updated 2026-09-12.

Cognitive DAST Automation has a Nerq Trust Score of 43 (E). Automated security scanner integrating OWASP ZAP and Google Gemini.

#	Name	Trust	Grade	Stars	Key Difference
1	promptfoo/promptfoo	86	A	18.4k	Higher trust (86 vs 43); Much larger community
2	raptor	80	B	1.1k	Higher trust (80 vs 43); Much larger community
3	mcp-scan	79	B	1.5k	Higher trust (79 vs 43); Much larger community
4	CursorTouch/Windows-MCP	78	B	4.4k	Higher trust (78 vs 43); Much larger community
5	GreyDGL/PentestGPT	78	B	11.7k	Higher trust (78 vs 43); Much larger community
6	cisco-ai-defense/mcp-scanner	78	B	809	Higher trust (78 vs 43); Much larger community
7	FunnyWolf/agentic-soc-platform	78	B	579	Higher trust (78 vs 43); Much larger community
8	SWE-agent/SWE-agent	77	B	18.5k	Higher trust (77 vs 43); Much larger community
9	samugit83/redamon	77	B	1.1k	Higher trust (77 vs 43); Much larger community
10	clawsec	77	B	542	Higher trust (77 vs 43); Much larger community
11	santosomar/AI-agents-for-cybersecurity	75	B	146	Higher trust (75 vs 43); Much larger community
12	duriantaco/skylos	75	B	360	Higher trust (75 vs 43); Much larger community
13	cyproxio/mcp-for-security	74	B	553	Higher trust (74 vs 43); Much larger community
14	SHAdd0WTAka/Zen-Ai-Pentest	74	B	272	Higher trust (74 vs 43); Much larger community
15	slither-mcp	74	B	71	Higher trust (74 vs 43); Much larger community

Compare

What are the best alternatives to Cognitive DAST Automation?

The top alternatives based on Nerq Trust Score are listed above, all independently evaluated for security and reliability.

Is it safe to switch from Cognitive DAST Automation?

Check each alternative's safety report by clicking its name. Trust scores above 70 indicate strong reliability.

How does Nerq rank Cognitive DAST Automation alternatives?

Alternatives are ranked by Trust Score v2, combining security, maintenance, documentation, and community signals.