Cursor A11y Alternatives

Safer and better-maintained options, ranked by Nerq Trust Score. Updated 2026-09-12.

Cursor A11y has a Nerq Trust Score of 42 (E). Cursor A11y performs automated accessibility testing for web applications.

#	Name	Trust	Grade	Stars	Key Difference
1	callstackincubator/agent-device	80	A	1.2k	Higher trust (80 vs 42); Much larger community
2	QwenLM/qwen-code	80	A	21.1k	Higher trust (80 vs 42); Much larger community
3	microsoft/azure-devops-mcp	80	B	1.3k	Higher trust (80 vs 42); Much larger community
4	GoogleCloudPlatform/agent-starter-pack	80	B	5.8k	Higher trust (80 vs 42); Much larger community
5	laravel/mcp	79	B	679	Higher trust (79 vs 42); Much larger community
6	wshobson/agents	79	B	29.1k	Higher trust (79 vs 42); Much larger community
7	aidlc-workflows	79	B	911	Higher trust (79 vs 42); Much larger community
8	PrefectHQ/fastmcp	79	B	23.1k	Higher trust (79 vs 42); Much larger community
9	UfoMiao/zcf	78	B	5.5k	Higher trust (78 vs 42); Much larger community
10	openclaw-ansible	78	B	271	Higher trust (78 vs 42); Much larger community
11	gh-aw	78	B	2.1k	Higher trust (78 vs 42); Much larger community
12	astron-rpa	77	B	6.5k	Higher trust (77 vs 42); Much larger community
13	droidrun/droidrun	77	B	7.7k	Higher trust (77 vs 42); Much larger community
14	LazyAGI/LazyLLM	77	B	3.7k	Higher trust (77 vs 42); Much larger community
15	kagent-dev/kmcp	77	B	427	Higher trust (77 vs 42); Much larger community

Compare

What are the best alternatives to Cursor A11y?

The top alternatives based on Nerq Trust Score are listed above, all independently evaluated for security and reliability.

Is it safe to switch from Cursor A11y?

Check each alternative's safety report by clicking its name. Trust scores above 70 indicate strong reliability.

How does Nerq rank Cursor A11y alternatives?

Alternatives are ranked by Trust Score v2, combining security, maintenance, documentation, and community signals.