mcp-pve Alternatives

Safer and better-maintained options, ranked by Nerq Trust Score. Updated 2026-09-26.

mcp-pve has a Nerq Trust Score of 60 (C). MCP server for Proxmox VE to manage infrastructure through AI coding tools

#	Name	Trust	Grade	Stars	Key Difference
1	callstackincubator/agent-device	80	A	1.2k	Higher trust (80 vs 60); Much larger community
2	microsoft/azure-devops-mcp	80	B	1.3k	Higher trust (80 vs 60); Much larger community
3	GoogleCloudPlatform/agent-starter-pack	80	B	5.8k	Higher trust (80 vs 60); Much larger community
4	laravel/mcp	79	B	679	Higher trust (79 vs 60); Much larger community
5	wshobson/agents	79	B	29.1k	Higher trust (79 vs 60); Much larger community
6	aidlc-workflows	79	B	911	Higher trust (79 vs 60); Much larger community
7	PrefectHQ/fastmcp	79	B	23.1k	Higher trust (79 vs 60); Much larger community
8	UfoMiao/zcf	78	B	5.5k	Higher trust (78 vs 60); Much larger community
9	openclaw-ansible	78	B	271	Higher trust (78 vs 60); Much larger community
10	gh-aw	78	B	2.1k	Higher trust (78 vs 60); Much larger community
11	astron-rpa	77	B	6.5k	Higher trust (77 vs 60); Much larger community
12	droidrun/droidrun	77	B	7.7k	Higher trust (77 vs 60); Much larger community
13	LazyAGI/LazyLLM	77	B	3.7k	Higher trust (77 vs 60); Much larger community
14	kagent-dev/kmcp	77	B	427	Higher trust (77 vs 60); Much larger community
15	test-zeus-ai/testzeus-hercules	76	B	943	Higher trust (76 vs 60); Much larger community

Compare

What are the best alternatives to mcp-pve?

The top alternatives based on Nerq Trust Score are listed above, all independently evaluated for security and reliability.

Is it safe to switch from mcp-pve?

Check each alternative's safety report by clicking its name. Trust scores above 70 indicate strong reliability.

How does Nerq rank mcp-pve alternatives?

Alternatives are ranked by Trust Score v2, combining security, maintenance, documentation, and community signals.