MCP-Security-Checklist Alternatives

Safer and better-maintained options, ranked by Nerq Trust Score. Updated 2026-09-14.

MCP-Security-Checklist has a Nerq Trust Score of 60 (C). A comprehensive security checklist for MCP-based AI tools. Built by SlowMist to safeguard LLM plugin ecosystems.

#	Name	Trust	Grade	Stars	Key Difference
1	promptfoo/promptfoo	86	A	18.4k	Higher trust (86 vs 60); Much larger community
2	raptor	80	B	1.1k	Higher trust (80 vs 60); More stars
3	mcp-scan	79	B	1.5k	Higher trust (79 vs 60); More stars
4	CursorTouch/Windows-MCP	78	B	4.4k	Higher trust (78 vs 60); Much larger community
5	GreyDGL/PentestGPT	78	B	11.7k	Higher trust (78 vs 60); Much larger community
6	cisco-ai-defense/mcp-scanner	78	B	809	Higher trust (78 vs 60); More stars
7	FunnyWolf/agentic-soc-platform	78	B	579	Higher trust (78 vs 60)
8	SWE-agent/SWE-agent	77	B	18.5k	Higher trust (77 vs 60); Much larger community
9	samugit83/redamon	77	B	1.1k	Higher trust (77 vs 60); More stars
10	clawsec	77	B	542	Higher trust (77 vs 60)
11	santosomar/AI-agents-for-cybersecurity	75	B	146	Higher trust (75 vs 60)
12	duriantaco/skylos	75	B	360	Higher trust (75 vs 60)
13	cyproxio/mcp-for-security	74	B	553	Higher trust (74 vs 60)
14	SHAdd0WTAka/Zen-Ai-Pentest	74	B	272	Higher trust (74 vs 60)
15	slither-mcp	74	B	71	Higher trust (74 vs 60)

Compare

FAQ

What are the best alternatives to MCP-Security-Checklist?

The top alternatives based on Nerq Trust Score are listed above, all independently evaluated for security and reliability.

Is it safe to switch from MCP-Security-Checklist?

Check each alternative's safety report by clicking its name. Trust scores above 70 indicate strong reliability.

How does Nerq rank MCP-Security-Checklist alternatives?

Alternatives are ranked by Trust Score v2, combining security, maintenance, documentation, and community signals.