ScreenHand Alternatives
Safer and better-maintained options, ranked by Nerq Trust Score. Updated 2026-07-15.
ScreenHand has a Nerq Trust Score of 45 (E). Native desktop control for MCP agents.
| # | Name | Trust | Grade | Stars | Key Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | trustrails-mcp-server | 73 | B | - | Higher trust (73 vs 45) |
| 2 | zookeeper | 73 | B | 1.5k | Higher trust (73 vs 45); Much larger community |
| 3 | tinyfish-io/agentql-mcp | 73 | B | 148 | Higher trust (73 vs 45); Much larger community |
| 4 | fibaro-mcp | 73 | B | 1 | Higher trust (73 vs 45) |
| 5 | Azure/aks-mcp | 73 | B | 115 | Higher trust (73 vs 45); Much larger community |
| 6 | takashiishida/arxiv-latex-mcp | 73 | B | 100 | Higher trust (73 vs 45); Much larger community |
| 7 | k3s-mcp-server | 73 | B | 1 | Higher trust (73 vs 45) |
| 8 | IoT-Edge-MCP-Server | 73 | B | - | Higher trust (73 vs 45) |
| 9 | Agent_Analysis | 73 | B | - | Higher trust (73 vs 45) |
| 10 | Azure/GPT-RAG | 73 | B | 1.1k | Higher trust (73 vs 45); Much larger community |
| 11 | ConnorBritain/mssql-mcp-server | 73 | B | 7 | Higher trust (73 vs 45) |
| 12 | mcp_server_fhir | 73 | B | - | Higher trust (73 vs 45) |
| 13 | x402-ipfs-agent | 73 | B | - | Higher trust (73 vs 45) |
| 14 | salesforce-foundryagent | 73 | B | - | Higher trust (73 vs 45) |
| 15 | hunt-protocol-mcp | 73 | B | - | Higher trust (73 vs 45) |
Compare
- ScreenHand vs trustrails-mcp-server
- ScreenHand vs zookeeper
- ScreenHand vs tinyfish-io/agentql-mcp
- ScreenHand vs fibaro-mcp
- ScreenHand vs Azure/aks-mcp
FAQ
What are the best alternatives to ScreenHand?
The top alternatives based on Nerq Trust Score are listed above, all independently evaluated for security and reliability.
Is it safe to switch from ScreenHand?
Check each alternative's safety report by clicking its name. Trust scores above 70 indicate strong reliability.
How does Nerq rank ScreenHand alternatives?
Alternatives are ranked by Trust Score v2, combining security, maintenance, documentation, and community signals.