Sub-Soft/Siliv Alternatives
Safer and better-maintained options, ranked by Nerq Trust Score. Updated 2026-04-23.
Sub-Soft/Siliv has a Nerq Trust Score of 68 (C). MacOS menu‑bar utility to adjust Apple Silicon GPU VRAM allocation
| # | Name | Trust | Grade | Stars | Key Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | mcp-sequentialthinking-tools | 81 | A | 563 | Higher trust (81 vs 68); Much larger community |
| 2 | sidekick | 79 | B | - | Higher trust (79 vs 68) |
| 3 | pai-hindsight-memory | 76 | B | - | Higher trust (76 vs 68) |
| 4 | weft | 76 | B | 473 | Higher trust (76 vs 68); More stars |
| 5 | Paramchoudhary/ResumeSkills | 76 | B | 72 | Higher trust (76 vs 68) |
| 6 | stillpoint | 76 | B | 2 | Higher trust (76 vs 68) |
| 7 | rush86999/atom | 76 | B | 702 | Higher trust (76 vs 68); Much larger community |
| 8 | ultimate-brain-mcp | 76 | B | 1 | Higher trust (76 vs 68) |
| 9 | openclaw-windows-hub | 75 | B | 205 | Higher trust (75 vs 68) |
| 10 | ErlichLiu/Proma | 75 | B | 154 | Higher trust (75 vs 68) |
| 11 | browser.icu | 75 | B | - | Higher trust (75 vs 68) |
| 12 | ai-workflow-task-agent | 75 | B | - | Higher trust (75 vs 68) |
| 13 | craft-agents-oss | 75 | B | - | Higher trust (75 vs 68) |
| 14 | second-brain-agent | 75 | B | - | Higher trust (75 vs 68) |
| 15 | loomos | 75 | B | - | Higher trust (75 vs 68) |
Compare
- Sub-Soft/Siliv vs mcp-sequentialthinking-tools
- Sub-Soft/Siliv vs sidekick
- Sub-Soft/Siliv vs pai-hindsight-memory
- Sub-Soft/Siliv vs weft
- Sub-Soft/Siliv vs Paramchoudhary/ResumeSkills
FAQ
What are the best alternatives to Sub-Soft/Siliv?
The top alternatives based on Nerq Trust Score are listed above, all independently evaluated for security and reliability.
Is it safe to switch from Sub-Soft/Siliv?
Check each alternative's safety report by clicking its name. Trust scores above 70 indicate strong reliability.
How does Nerq rank Sub-Soft/Siliv alternatives?
Alternatives are ranked by Trust Score v2, combining security, maintenance, documentation, and community signals.