aasm vs async-timeout — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of aasm and async-timeout. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

aasm scores 68.2/100 (B-) while async-timeout scores 73.2/100 (B) on the Nerq Trust Score. async-timeout leads by 5.0 points. aasm is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars. async-timeout is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified.
68.2
B-
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcegems
Security90
Maintenance50
Documentation65
vs
73.2
B verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcepypi
Security90
Maintenance70
Documentation65

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric aasm async-timeout
Trust Score68.2/10073.2/100
GradeB-B
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security9090
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance5070
Documentation6565
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoYes

Verdict

async-timeout leads with a trust score of 73.2/100 compared to aasm's 68.2/100 (a 5.0-point difference). async-timeout scores higher on maintenance (70 vs 50). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

aasm leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to async-timeout's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

async-timeout demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (70/100 vs 50/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

aasm has better documentation (65/100 vs 65/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

aasm has 0 GitHub stars while async-timeout has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose aasm if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose async-timeout if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence

Switching from aasm to async-timeout (or vice versa)

When migrating between aasm and async-timeout, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: aasm (uncategorized) and async-timeout (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the aasm safety report and async-timeout safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: aasm has 0 stars and async-timeout has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
aasm Safety Report async-timeout Safety Report aasm Alternatives async-timeout Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, aasm or async-timeout?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, aasm has a trust score of 68.2/100 (B-) while async-timeout scores 73.2/100 (B). The 5.0-point difference suggests async-timeout has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do aasm and async-timeout compare on security?
aasm has a security score of 90/100 and async-timeout scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. aasm's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while async-timeout's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use aasm or async-timeout?
The choice depends on your requirements. aasm (uncategorized, 0 stars) and async-timeout (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, aasm scores 68.2/100 and async-timeout scores 73.2/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (65 vs 65), and maintenance activity (50 vs 70).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-27 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy