addic7ed vs create-sss — Trust Score Comparison

Name: addic7ed vs create-sss Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of addic7ed and create-sss. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

addic7ed scores 61.0/100 (C+) while create-sss scores 56.0/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. addic7ed leads by 5.0 points. addic7ed is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars. create-sss is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars.

addic7ed

61.0

C+

Categoryuncategorized

Stars0

Sourcepypi

Security90

Maintenance72

Documentation65

create-sss

56.0

Categoryuncategorized

Stars0

Sourcenpm

Security90

Maintenance58

Documentation65

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	addic7ed	create-sss
Trust Score	61.0/100	56.0/100
Grade	C+	C
Stars	0	0
Category	uncategorized	uncategorized
Security	90	90
Compliance	N/A	N/A
Maintenance	72	58
Documentation	65	65
EU AI Act Risk	N/A	N/A
Verified	No	No

Verdict

addic7ed leads with a trust score of 61.0/100 compared to create-sss's 56.0/100 (a 5.0-point difference). addic7ed scores higher on maintenance (72 vs 58). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

addic7ed leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to create-sss's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

addic7ed demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (72/100 vs 58/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

addic7ed has better documentation (65/100 vs 65/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

addic7ed has 0 GitHub stars while create-sss has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose addic7ed if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
More actively maintained with faster release cadence

Choose create-sss if you need:

Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Switching from addic7ed to create-sss (or vice versa)

When migrating between addic7ed and create-sss, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: addic7ed (uncategorized) and create-sss (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the addic7ed safety report and create-sss safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: addic7ed has 0 stars and create-sss has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

addic7ed Safety Report create-sss Safety Report addic7ed Alternatives create-sss Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, addic7ed or create-sss?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, addic7ed has a trust score of 61.0/100 (C+) while create-sss scores 56.0/100 (C). The 5.0-point difference suggests addic7ed has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do addic7ed and create-sss compare on security?

addic7ed has a security score of 90/100 and create-sss scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. addic7ed's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while create-sss's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).

Should I use addic7ed or create-sss?

The choice depends on your requirements. addic7ed (uncategorized, 0 stars) and create-sss (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, addic7ed scores 61.0/100 and create-sss scores 56.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (65 vs 65), and maintenance activity (72 vs 58).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-10-03 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.