fastagency vs KeepAI — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of fastagency and KeepAI. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

fastagency scores 61.7/100 (C+) while KeepAI scores 60.2/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. The two agents are essentially tied on overall trust. fastagency is a agent_platform agent with 528 stars. KeepAI is a agent_platform agent with 2 stars.
61.7
C+
Categoryagent_platform
Stars528
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
60.2
C
Categoryagent_platform
Stars2
Sourcegithub
Security0
Maintenance1
Documentation1

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric fastagency KeepAI
Trust Score61.7/10060.2/100
GradeC+C
Stars5282
Categoryagent_platformagent_platform
Security10
Compliance100N/A
Maintenance11
Documentation11
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

fastagency (61.7) and KeepAI (60.2) have nearly identical trust scores. Both are solid choices. The decision should come down to your specific use case, team preferences, and integration requirements rather than trust differences.

Detailed Analysis

Security

fastagency leads on security with a score of 1/100 compared to KeepAI's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

fastagency demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

fastagency has better documentation (1/100 vs 1/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

fastagency has 528 GitHub stars while KeepAI has 2. fastagency has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose fastagency if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • Larger community (528 vs 2 stars)

Choose KeepAI if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Switching from fastagency to KeepAI (or vice versa)

When migrating between fastagency and KeepAI, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: fastagency (agent_platform) and KeepAI (agent_platform) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the fastagency safety report and KeepAI safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: fastagency has 528 stars and KeepAI has 2. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
fastagency Safety Report KeepAI Safety Report fastagency Alternatives KeepAI Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, fastagency or KeepAI?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, fastagency has a trust score of 61.7/100 (C+) while KeepAI scores 60.2/100 (C). Both agents are very close in overall trust. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do fastagency and KeepAI compare on security?
fastagency has a security score of 1/100 and KeepAI scores 0/100. Both have comparable security profiles. fastagency's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A), while KeepAI's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use fastagency or KeepAI?
The choice depends on your requirements. fastagency (agent_platform, 528 stars) and KeepAI (agent_platform, 2 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, fastagency scores 61.7/100 and KeepAI scores 60.2/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 1), and maintenance activity (1 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-05-21 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy