agents.md vs cortex-code-cli-extensions — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of agents.md and cortex-code-cli-extensions. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

agents.md scores 0.0/100 (A) while cortex-code-cli-extensions scores 64.5/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. cortex-code-cli-extensions leads by 64.5 points. agents.md is a coding agent with 17,324 stars. cortex-code-cli-extensions is a coding agent with 0 stars.
0.0
A
Categorycoding
Stars17,324
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
64.5
C
Categorycoding
Stars0
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation1

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric agents.md cortex-code-cli-extensions
Trust Score0.0/10064.5/100
GradeAC
Stars17,3240
Categorycodingcoding
Security00
Compliance100100
Maintenance11
Documentation11
EU AI Act RiskN/Aminimal
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

cortex-code-cli-extensions leads with a trust score of 64.5/100 compared to agents.md's 0.0/100 (a 64.5-point difference). However, agents.md has stronger community adoption (17,324 vs 0 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

agents.md leads on security with a score of 0/100 compared to cortex-code-cli-extensions's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

agents.md demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

agents.md has better documentation (1/100 vs 1/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

agents.md has 17,324 GitHub stars while cortex-code-cli-extensions has 0. agents.md has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose agents.md if you need:

  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (17,324 vs 0 stars)

Choose cortex-code-cli-extensions if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Switching from agents.md to cortex-code-cli-extensions (or vice versa)

When migrating between agents.md and cortex-code-cli-extensions, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: agents.md (coding) and cortex-code-cli-extensions (coding) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the agents.md safety report and cortex-code-cli-extensions safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: agents.md has 17,324 stars and cortex-code-cli-extensions has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
agents.md Safety Report cortex-code-cli-extensions Safety Report agents.md Alternatives cortex-code-cli-extensions Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, agents.md or cortex-code-cli-extensions?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, agents.md has a trust score of 0.0/100 (A) while cortex-code-cli-extensions scores 64.5/100 (C). The 64.5-point difference suggests cortex-code-cli-extensions has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do agents.md and cortex-code-cli-extensions compare on security?
agents.md has a security score of 0/100 and cortex-code-cli-extensions scores 0/100. Both have comparable security profiles. agents.md's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A), while cortex-code-cli-extensions's is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal).
Should I use agents.md or cortex-code-cli-extensions?
The choice depends on your requirements. agents.md (coding, 17,324 stars) and cortex-code-cli-extensions (coding, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, agents.md scores 0.0/100 and cortex-code-cli-extensions scores 64.5/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 1), and maintenance activity (1 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-07-28 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy