agno vs oh-my-opencode — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of agno and oh-my-opencode. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

agno scores 65.5/100 (B-) while oh-my-opencode scores 64.1/100 (C+) on the Nerq Trust Score. The two agents are essentially tied on overall trust. agno is a coding agent with 38,178 stars. oh-my-opencode is a coding agent with 32,670 stars.
65.5
B-
Categorycoding
Stars38,178
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
64.1
C+
Categorycoding
Stars32,670
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance87
Maintenance1
Documentation1

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric agno oh-my-opencode
Trust Score65.5/10064.1/100
GradeB-C+
Stars38,17832,670
Categorycodingcoding
Security11
Compliance10087
Maintenance11
Documentation11
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

agno (65.5) and oh-my-opencode (64.1) have nearly identical trust scores. Both are solid choices. The decision should come down to your specific use case, team preferences, and integration requirements rather than trust differences.

Detailed Analysis

Security

oh-my-opencode leads on security with a score of 1/100 compared to agno's 1/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

agno demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

agno has better documentation (1/100 vs 1/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

agno has 38,178 GitHub stars while oh-my-opencode has 32,670. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose agno if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (38,178 vs 32,670 stars)

Choose oh-my-opencode if you need:

  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities

Switching from agno to oh-my-opencode (or vice versa)

When migrating between agno and oh-my-opencode, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: agno (coding) and oh-my-opencode (coding) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the agno safety report and oh-my-opencode safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: agno has 38,178 stars and oh-my-opencode has 32,670. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
agno Safety Report oh-my-opencode Safety Report agno Alternatives oh-my-opencode Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, agno or oh-my-opencode?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, agno has a trust score of 65.5/100 (B-) while oh-my-opencode scores 64.1/100 (C+). Both agents are very close in overall trust. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do agno and oh-my-opencode compare on security?
agno has a security score of 1/100 and oh-my-opencode scores 1/100. Both have comparable security profiles. agno's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A), while oh-my-opencode's is 87/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use agno or oh-my-opencode?
The choice depends on your requirements. agno (coding, 38,178 stars) and oh-my-opencode (coding, 32,670 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, agno scores 65.5/100 and oh-my-opencode scores 64.1/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 1), and maintenance activity (1 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-05-20 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy