opencode vs cursor — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of opencode and cursor. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

opencode scores 87.9/100 (A) while cursor scores 51.5/100 (D) on the Nerq Trust Score. opencode leads by 36.4 points. opencode is a coding agent with 108,137 stars, Nerq Verified. cursor is a coding agent with 50,000 stars, Nerq Verified.
87.9
A verified
Categorycoding
Stars108,137
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
51.5
D verified
Categorycoding
Stars50,000
Sourcegithub

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric opencode cursor
Trust Score87.9/10051.5/100
GradeAD
Stars108,13750,000
Categorycodingcoding
Security1N/A
Compliance100N/A
Maintenance1N/A
Documentation1N/A
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedYesYes

Verdict

opencode leads with a trust score of 87.9/100 compared to cursor's 51.5/100 (a 36.4-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. opencode scores 1 and cursor scores N/A on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. opencode: 1, cursor: N/A.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. opencode: 1, cursor: N/A.

Community & Adoption

opencode has 108,137 GitHub stars while cursor has 50,000. opencode has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose opencode if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (108,137 vs 50,000 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose cursor if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Switching from opencode to cursor (or vice versa)

When migrating between opencode and cursor, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: opencode (coding) and cursor (coding) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the opencode safety report and cursor safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: opencode has 108,137 stars and cursor has 50,000. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
opencode Safety Report cursor Safety Report opencode Alternatives cursor Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, opencode or cursor?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, opencode has a trust score of 87.9/100 (A) while cursor scores 51.5/100 (D). The 36.4-point difference suggests opencode has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do opencode and cursor compare on security?
opencode has a security score of 1/100 and cursor scores N/A/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. opencode's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A), while cursor's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use opencode or cursor?
The choice depends on your requirements. opencode (coding, 108,137 stars) and cursor (coding, 50,000 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, opencode scores 87.9/100 and cursor scores 51.5/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs N/A), and maintenance activity (1 vs N/A).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-04-05 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy