opencode vs Knowledge Graph Memory — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of opencode and Knowledge Graph Memory. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

opencode scores 87.9/100 (A) while Knowledge Graph Memory scores 49.9/100 (D) on the Nerq Trust Score. opencode leads by 38.0 points. opencode is a coding tool with 108,137 stars, Nerq Verified. Knowledge Graph Memory is a AI tool tool with 80,518 stars.
87.9
A verified
Categorycoding
Stars108,137
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
49.9
D
CategoryAI tool
Stars80,518
Sourcepulsemcp

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric opencode Knowledge Graph Memory
Trust Score87.9/10049.9/100
GradeAD
Stars108,13780,518
CategorycodingAI tool
Security1N/A
Compliance100N/A
Maintenance1N/A
Documentation1N/A
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedYesNo

Verdict

opencode leads with a trust score of 87.9/100 compared to Knowledge Graph Memory's 49.9/100 (a 38.0-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. opencode scores 1 and Knowledge Graph Memory scores N/A on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. opencode: 1, Knowledge Graph Memory: N/A.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. opencode: 1, Knowledge Graph Memory: N/A.

Community & Adoption

opencode has 108,137 GitHub stars while Knowledge Graph Memory has 80,518. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose opencode if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (108,137 vs 80,518 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose Knowledge Graph Memory if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Switching from opencode to Knowledge Graph Memory (or vice versa)

When migrating between opencode and Knowledge Graph Memory, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: opencode (coding) and Knowledge Graph Memory (AI tool) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the opencode safety report and Knowledge Graph Memory safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: opencode has 108,137 stars and Knowledge Graph Memory has 80,518. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
opencode Safety Report Knowledge Graph Memory Safety Report opencode Alternatives Knowledge Graph Memory Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, opencode or Knowledge Graph Memory?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, opencode has a trust score of 87.9/100 (A) while Knowledge Graph Memory scores 49.9/100 (D). The 38.0-point difference suggests opencode has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do opencode and Knowledge Graph Memory compare on security?
opencode has a security score of 1/100 and Knowledge Graph Memory scores N/A/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. opencode's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A), while Knowledge Graph Memory's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use opencode or Knowledge Graph Memory?
The choice depends on your requirements. opencode (coding, 108,137 stars) and Knowledge Graph Memory (AI tool, 80,518 stars) serve different use cases. On trust, opencode scores 87.9/100 and Knowledge Graph Memory scores 49.9/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs N/A), and maintenance activity (1 vs N/A).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-04-01 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy