opencode vs ollama — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of opencode and ollama. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

opencode scores 64.1/100 (C+) while ollama scores 58.0/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. opencode leads by 6.1 points. opencode is a coding agent with 108,137 stars. ollama is a coding agent with 163,038 stars.
64.1
C+
Categorycoding
Stars108,137
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
58.0
C
Categorycoding
Stars163,038
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation0

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric opencode ollama
Trust Score64.1/10058.0/100
GradeC+C
Stars108,137163,038
Categorycodingcoding
Security10
Compliance100100
Maintenance11
Documentation10
EU AI Act RiskN/Aminimal
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

opencode leads with a trust score of 64.1/100 compared to ollama's 58.0/100 (a 6.1-point difference). opencode scores higher on security (1 vs 0). However, ollama has stronger community adoption (163,038 vs 108,137 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

opencode leads on security with a score of 1/100 compared to ollama's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

opencode demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

opencode has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

opencode has 108,137 GitHub stars while ollama has 163,038. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose opencode if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose ollama if you need:

  • Larger community (163,038 vs 108,137 stars)

Switching from opencode to ollama (or vice versa)

When migrating between opencode and ollama, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: opencode (coding) and ollama (coding) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the opencode safety report and ollama safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: opencode has 108,137 stars and ollama has 163,038. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
opencode Safety Report ollama Safety Report opencode Alternatives ollama Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, opencode or ollama?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, opencode has a trust score of 64.1/100 (C+) while ollama scores 58.0/100 (C). The 6.1-point difference suggests opencode has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do opencode and ollama compare on security?
opencode has a security score of 1/100 and ollama scores 0/100. Both have comparable security profiles. opencode's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A), while ollama's is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal).
Should I use opencode or ollama?
The choice depends on your requirements. opencode (coding, 108,137 stars) and ollama (coding, 163,038 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, opencode scores 64.1/100 and ollama scores 58.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 0), and maintenance activity (1 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-05-27 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy