archive vs CMB2 — Trust Score Comparison

Name: archive vs CMB2 Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of archive and CMB2. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

archive scores 64.5/100 (C+) while CMB2 scores 61.8/100 (C+) on the Nerq Trust Score. archive leads by 2.7 points. archive is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars. CMB2 is a uncategorized agent with 5 stars.

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	archive	CMB2
Trust Score	64.5/100	61.8/100
Grade	C+	C+
Stars	0	5
Category	uncategorized	uncategorized
Security	90	90
Compliance	N/A	N/A
Maintenance	50	50
Documentation	65	40
EU AI Act Risk	N/A	N/A
Verified	No	No

Verdict

archive leads with a trust score of 64.5/100 compared to CMB2's 61.8/100 (a 2.7-point difference). However, CMB2 has stronger community adoption (5 vs 0 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

archive leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to CMB2's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

archive demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (50/100 vs 50/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

archive has better documentation (65/100 vs 40/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

archive has 0 GitHub stars while CMB2 has 5. CMB2 has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose archive if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose CMB2 if you need:

Larger community (5 vs 0 stars)

Switching from archive to CMB2 (or vice versa)

When migrating between archive and CMB2, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: archive (uncategorized) and CMB2 (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the archive safety report and CMB2 safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: archive has 0 stars and CMB2 has 5. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

archive Safety Report CMB2 Safety Report archive Alternatives CMB2 Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, archive or CMB2?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, archive has a trust score of 64.5/100 (C+) while CMB2 scores 61.8/100 (C+). The 2.7-point difference suggests archive has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do archive and CMB2 compare on security?

archive has a security score of 90/100 and CMB2 scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. archive's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while CMB2's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).

Should I use archive or CMB2?

The choice depends on your requirements. archive (uncategorized, 0 stars) and CMB2 (uncategorized, 5 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, archive scores 64.5/100 and CMB2 scores 61.8/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (65 vs 40), and maintenance activity (50 vs 50).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-08-03 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.