agents vs ScapeGraph — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of agents and ScapeGraph. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

agents scores 77.1/100 (B) while ScapeGraph scores 66.5/100 (D) on the Nerq Trust Score. agents leads by 10.6 points. agents is a data agent with 291 stars, Nerq Verified. ScapeGraph is a data agent with 58 stars.
77.1
B verified
Categorydata
Stars291
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
66.5
D
Categorydata
Stars58
Sourcepulsemcp
Maintenance0
Documentation0

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric agents ScapeGraph
Trust Score77.1/10066.5/100
GradeBD
Stars29158
Categorydatadata
Security1N/A
Compliance100N/A
Maintenance10
Documentation10
EU AI Act RiskminimalN/A
VerifiedYesNo

Verdict

agents leads with a trust score of 77.1/100 compared to ScapeGraph's 66.5/100 (a 10.6-point difference). agents scores higher on maintenance (1 vs 0). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. agents scores 1 and ScapeGraph scores N/A on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

agents demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 0/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

agents has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

agents has 291 GitHub stars while ScapeGraph has 58. agents has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose agents if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (291 vs 58 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose ScapeGraph if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Switching from agents to ScapeGraph (or vice versa)

When migrating between agents and ScapeGraph, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: agents (data) and ScapeGraph (data) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the agents safety report and ScapeGraph safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: agents has 291 stars and ScapeGraph has 58. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
agents Safety Report ScapeGraph Safety Report agents Alternatives ScapeGraph Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, agents or ScapeGraph?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, agents has a trust score of 77.1/100 (B) while ScapeGraph scores 66.5/100 (D). The 10.6-point difference suggests agents has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do agents and ScapeGraph compare on security?
agents has a security score of 1/100 and ScapeGraph scores N/A/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. agents's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal), while ScapeGraph's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use agents or ScapeGraph?
The choice depends on your requirements. agents (data, 291 stars) and ScapeGraph (data, 58 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, agents scores 77.1/100 and ScapeGraph scores 66.5/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 0), and maintenance activity (1 vs 0).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-01 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy