raw-keyring vs testing — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of raw-keyring and testing. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

raw-keyring scores 76.0/100 (B+) while testing scores 86.0/100 (A) on the Nerq Trust Score. testing leads by 10.0 points. raw-keyring is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified. testing is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified.
76.0
B+ verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance78
Documentation80
vs
86.0
A verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance100
Documentation80

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric raw-keyring testing
Trust Score76.0/10086.0/100
GradeB+A
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security9090
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance78100
Documentation8080
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedYesYes

Verdict

testing leads with a trust score of 86.0/100 compared to raw-keyring's 76.0/100 (a 10.0-point difference). testing scores higher on maintenance (100 vs 78). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

raw-keyring leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to testing's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

testing demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (100/100 vs 78/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

raw-keyring has better documentation (80/100 vs 80/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

raw-keyring has 0 GitHub stars while testing has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose raw-keyring if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose testing if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence

Switching from raw-keyring to testing (or vice versa)

When migrating between raw-keyring and testing, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: raw-keyring (uncategorized) and testing (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the raw-keyring safety report and testing safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: raw-keyring has 0 stars and testing has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
raw-keyring Safety Report testing Safety Report raw-keyring Alternatives testing Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, raw-keyring or testing?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, raw-keyring has a trust score of 76.0/100 (B+) while testing scores 86.0/100 (A). The 10.0-point difference suggests testing has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do raw-keyring and testing compare on security?
raw-keyring has a security score of 90/100 and testing scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. raw-keyring's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while testing's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use raw-keyring or testing?
The choice depends on your requirements. raw-keyring (uncategorized, 0 stars) and testing (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, raw-keyring scores 76.0/100 and testing scores 86.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (80 vs 80), and maintenance activity (78 vs 100).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-08-25 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy