backoff-func vs stable-hash — Trust Score Comparison

Name: backoff-func vs stable-hash Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of backoff-func and stable-hash. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

backoff-func scores 57.8/100 (D) while stable-hash scores 56.8/100 (D) on the Nerq Trust Score. The two agents are essentially tied on overall trust. backoff-func is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars. stable-hash is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars.

backoff — Nerq Trust Score 77.5/100 (B+). httpx — Nerq Trust Score 80.8/100 (A-). httpx leads by 3.3 points.

backoff-func

57.8

Categoryuncategorized

Stars0

Sourcenpm_full

Compliance100

stable-hash

56.8

Categoryuncategorized

Stars0

Sourcenpm_full

Compliance100

Detailed Score Analysis

Dimension	backoff	httpx
Security	90/100	90/100
Maintenance	87/100	100/100
Popularity	100/100	100/100
Quality	65/100	65/100
Community	35/100	35/100

Five-dimension Nerq trust breakdown (registries: pypi / pypi). Scored equally weighted across security, maintenance, popularity, quality, community.

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	backoff-func	stable-hash
Trust Score	57.8/100	56.8/100
Grade	D	D
Stars	0	0
Category	uncategorized	uncategorized
Security	N/A	N/A
Compliance	100	100
Maintenance	N/A	N/A
Documentation	N/A	N/A
EU AI Act Risk	N/A	N/A
Verified	No	No

Verdict

backoff-func (57.8) and stable-hash (56.8) have nearly identical trust scores. Both are solid choices. The decision should come down to your specific use case, team preferences, and integration requirements rather than trust differences.

Detailed Analysis

Community & Adoption

backoff-func has 0 GitHub stars while stable-hash has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose backoff-func if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Choose stable-hash if you need:

Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Switching from backoff-func to stable-hash (or vice versa)

When migrating between backoff-func and stable-hash, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: backoff-func (uncategorized) and stable-hash (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the backoff-func safety report and stable-hash safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: backoff-func has 0 stars and stable-hash has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

backoff-func Safety Report stable-hash Safety Report backoff-func Alternatives stable-hash Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, backoff-func or stable-hash?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, backoff-func has a trust score of 57.8/100 (D) while stable-hash scores 56.8/100 (D). Both agents are very close in overall trust. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do backoff-func and stable-hash compare on security?

backoff-func has a security score of N/A/100 and stable-hash scores N/A/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. backoff-func's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A), while stable-hash's is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A).

Should I use backoff-func or stable-hash?

The choice depends on your requirements. backoff-func (uncategorized, 0 stars) and stable-hash (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, backoff-func scores 57.8/100 and stable-hash scores 56.8/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (N/A vs N/A), and maintenance activity (N/A vs N/A).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-06-02 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.