battery vs authx-extra — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of battery and authx-extra. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

battery scores 59.5/100 (C) while authx-extra scores 59.0/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. The two agents are essentially tied on overall trust. battery is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars. authx-extra is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars.
59.5
C
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcecrates
Security90
Maintenance50
Documentation40
vs
59.0
C
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcepypi
Security90
Maintenance57
Documentation40

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric battery authx-extra
Trust Score59.5/10059.0/100
GradeCC
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security9090
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance5057
Documentation4040
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

battery (59.5) and authx-extra (59.0) have nearly identical trust scores. Both are solid choices. The decision should come down to your specific use case, team preferences, and integration requirements rather than trust differences.

Detailed Analysis

Security

battery leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to authx-extra's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

authx-extra demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (57/100 vs 50/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

battery has better documentation (40/100 vs 40/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

battery has 0 GitHub stars while authx-extra has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose battery if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Choose authx-extra if you need:

  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence

Switching from battery to authx-extra (or vice versa)

When migrating between battery and authx-extra, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: battery (uncategorized) and authx-extra (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the battery safety report and authx-extra safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: battery has 0 stars and authx-extra has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
battery Safety Report authx-extra Safety Report battery Alternatives authx-extra Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, battery or authx-extra?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, battery has a trust score of 59.5/100 (C) while authx-extra scores 59.0/100 (C). Both agents are very close in overall trust. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do battery and authx-extra compare on security?
battery has a security score of 90/100 and authx-extra scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. battery's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while authx-extra's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use battery or authx-extra?
The choice depends on your requirements. battery (uncategorized, 0 stars) and authx-extra (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, battery scores 59.5/100 and authx-extra scores 59.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (40 vs 40), and maintenance activity (50 vs 57).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-08-25 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy