BolFilter vs email-extractor — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of BolFilter and email-extractor. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

BolFilter scores 50.5/100 (C-) while email-extractor scores 55.0/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. email-extractor leads by 4.5 points. BolFilter is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars. email-extractor is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars.
50.5
C-
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcefirefox
Security90
Maintenance50
Documentation40
vs
55.0
C
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcecrates
Security90
Maintenance50
Documentation40

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric BolFilter email-extractor
Trust Score50.5/10055.0/100
GradeC-C
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security9090
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance5050
Documentation4040
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

email-extractor leads with a trust score of 55.0/100 compared to BolFilter's 50.5/100 (a 4.5-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

BolFilter leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to email-extractor's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

BolFilter demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (50/100 vs 50/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

BolFilter has better documentation (40/100 vs 40/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

BolFilter has 0 GitHub stars while email-extractor has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose BolFilter if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose email-extractor if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Switching from BolFilter to email-extractor (or vice versa)

When migrating between BolFilter and email-extractor, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: BolFilter (uncategorized) and email-extractor (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the BolFilter safety report and email-extractor safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: BolFilter has 0 stars and email-extractor has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
BolFilter Safety Report email-extractor Safety Report BolFilter Alternatives email-extractor Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, BolFilter or email-extractor?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, BolFilter has a trust score of 50.5/100 (C-) while email-extractor scores 55.0/100 (C). The 4.5-point difference suggests email-extractor has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do BolFilter and email-extractor compare on security?
BolFilter has a security score of 90/100 and email-extractor scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. BolFilter's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while email-extractor's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use BolFilter or email-extractor?
The choice depends on your requirements. BolFilter (uncategorized, 0 stars) and email-extractor (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, BolFilter scores 50.5/100 and email-extractor scores 55.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (40 vs 40), and maintenance activity (50 vs 50).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-13 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy