browser-use vs quivr — Trust Score Comparison
Side-by-side trust comparison of browser-use and quivr. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.
Detailed Metric Comparison
| Metric | browser-use | quivr |
|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 65.3/100 | 57.4/100 |
| Grade | B- | C |
| Stars | 79,962 | 38,942 |
| Category | coding | coding |
| Security | 1 | 0 |
| Compliance | 100 | 85 |
| Maintenance | 1 | 1 |
| Documentation | 1 | 0 |
| EU AI Act Risk | N/A | minimal |
| Verified | No | No |
Verdict
browser-use leads with a trust score of 65.3/100 compared to quivr's 57.4/100 (a 7.9-point difference). browser-use scores higher on security (1 vs 0), compliance (100 vs 85). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.
Detailed Analysis
Security
browser-use leads on security with a score of 1/100 compared to quivr's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.
Maintenance & Activity
browser-use demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.
Documentation
browser-use has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.
Community & Adoption
browser-use has 79,962 GitHub stars while quivr has 38,942. browser-use has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose browser-use if you need:
- Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
- Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
- Larger community (79,962 vs 38,942 stars)
- Better documentation for faster onboarding
Choose quivr if you need:
- Consider if it better fits your specific use case
Switching from browser-use to quivr (or vice versa)
When migrating between browser-use and quivr, consider these factors:
- API Compatibility: browser-use (coding) and quivr (coding) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
- Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the browser-use safety report and quivr safety report for known issues.
- Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
- Community Support: browser-use has 79,962 stars and quivr has 38,942. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
Related Pages
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-05-03 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.