sync-package vs users — Trust Score Comparison

Name: sync-package vs users Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of sync-package and users. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

sync-package scores 48.2/100 (D) while users scores 57.5/100 (C) on the Nerq Trust Score. users leads by 9.3 points. sync-package is a uncategorized agent with 1 stars. users is a uncategorized agent with 528 stars.

sync-package

48.2

Categoryuncategorized

Stars1

Sourcepackagist

Security90

Maintenance50

Documentation40

users

57.5

Categoryuncategorized

Stars528

Sourcepackagist

Security90

Maintenance50

Documentation30

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	sync-package	users
Trust Score	48.2/100	57.5/100
Grade	D	C
Stars	1	528
Category	uncategorized	uncategorized
Security	90	90
Compliance	N/A	N/A
Maintenance	50	50
Documentation	40	30
EU AI Act Risk	N/A	N/A
Verified	No	No

Verdict

users leads with a trust score of 57.5/100 compared to sync-package's 48.2/100 (a 9.3-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

sync-package leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to users's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

sync-package demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (50/100 vs 50/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

sync-package has better documentation (40/100 vs 30/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

sync-package has 1 GitHub stars while users has 528. users has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose sync-package if you need:

Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose users if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
Larger community (528 vs 1 stars)

Switching from sync-package to users (or vice versa)

When migrating between sync-package and users, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: sync-package (uncategorized) and users (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the sync-package safety report and users safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: sync-package has 1 stars and users has 528. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

sync-package Safety Report users Safety Report sync-package Alternatives users Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, sync-package or users?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, sync-package has a trust score of 48.2/100 (D) while users scores 57.5/100 (C). The 9.3-point difference suggests users has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do sync-package and users compare on security?

sync-package has a security score of 90/100 and users scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. sync-package's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while users's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).

Should I use sync-package or users?

The choice depends on your requirements. sync-package (uncategorized, 1 stars) and users (uncategorized, 528 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, sync-package scores 48.2/100 and users scores 57.5/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (40 vs 30), and maintenance activity (50 vs 50).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-18 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.