CodeForge vs Wan-2.2 — Trust Score Comparison

Name: CodeForge vs Wan-2.2 Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of CodeForge and Wan-2.2. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

CodeForge scores 0.0/100 (C) while Wan-2.2 scores 89.0/100 (A) on the Nerq Trust Score. Wan-2.2 leads by 89.0 points. CodeForge is a uncategorized tool with 1 stars. Wan-2.2 is a image-to-video tool with 977 stars, Nerq Verified.

CodeForge

0.0

Categoryuncategorized

Stars1

Sourcegithub

Security0

Compliance100

Maintenance0

Documentation0

Wan-2.2

89.0

A verified

Categoryimage-to-video

Stars977

Sourcehuggingface_models_v3

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	CodeForge	Wan-2.2
Trust Score	0.0/100	89.0/100
Grade	C	A
Stars	1	977
Category	uncategorized	image-to-video
Security	0	N/A
Compliance	100	N/A
Maintenance	0	N/A
Documentation	0	N/A
EU AI Act Risk	N/A	N/A
Verified	No	Yes

Verdict

Wan-2.2 leads with a trust score of 89.0/100 compared to CodeForge's 0.0/100 (a 89.0-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. CodeForge scores 0 and Wan-2.2 scores N/A on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. CodeForge: 0, Wan-2.2: N/A.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. CodeForge: 0, Wan-2.2: N/A.

Community & Adoption

CodeForge has 1 GitHub stars while Wan-2.2 has 977. Wan-2.2 has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose CodeForge if you need:

Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose Wan-2.2 if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
Larger community (977 vs 1 stars)

Switching from CodeForge to Wan-2.2 (or vice versa)

When migrating between CodeForge and Wan-2.2, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: CodeForge (uncategorized) and Wan-2.2 (image-to-video) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the CodeForge safety report and Wan-2.2 safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: CodeForge has 1 stars and Wan-2.2 has 977. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

CodeForge Safety Report Wan-2.2 Safety Report CodeForge Alternatives Wan-2.2 Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, CodeForge or Wan-2.2?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, CodeForge has a trust score of 0.0/100 (C) while Wan-2.2 scores 89.0/100 (A). The 89.0-point difference suggests Wan-2.2 has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do CodeForge and Wan-2.2 compare on security?

CodeForge has a security score of 0/100 and Wan-2.2 scores N/A/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. CodeForge's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A), while Wan-2.2's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).

Should I use CodeForge or Wan-2.2?

The choice depends on your requirements. CodeForge (uncategorized, 1 stars) and Wan-2.2 (image-to-video, 977 stars) serve different use cases. On trust, CodeForge scores 0.0/100 and Wan-2.2 scores 89.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (0 vs N/A), and maintenance activity (0 vs N/A).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-11-15 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.