n8n-mcp vs gastown — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of n8n-mcp and gastown. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

n8n-mcp scores 61.6/100 (C+) while gastown scores 68.5/100 (B-) on the Nerq Trust Score. gastown leads by 6.9 points. n8n-mcp is a devops agent with 13,805 stars. gastown is a devops agent with 10,024 stars.
61.6
C+
Categorydevops
Stars13,805
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
68.5
B-
Categorydevops
Stars10,024
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation0

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric n8n-mcp gastown
Trust Score61.6/10068.5/100
GradeC+B-
Stars13,80510,024
Categorydevopsdevops
Security10
Compliance100100
Maintenance11
Documentation10
EU AI Act Risklimitedminimal
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

gastown leads with a trust score of 68.5/100 compared to n8n-mcp's 61.6/100 (a 6.9-point difference). However, n8n-mcp has stronger community adoption (13,805 vs 10,024 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

n8n-mcp leads on security with a score of 1/100 compared to gastown's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

n8n-mcp demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

n8n-mcp has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

n8n-mcp has 13,805 GitHub stars while gastown has 10,024. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose n8n-mcp if you need:

  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • Larger community (13,805 vs 10,024 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose gastown if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Switching from n8n-mcp to gastown (or vice versa)

When migrating between n8n-mcp and gastown, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: n8n-mcp (devops) and gastown (devops) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the n8n-mcp safety report and gastown safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: n8n-mcp has 13,805 stars and gastown has 10,024. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
n8n-mcp Safety Report gastown Safety Report n8n-mcp Alternatives gastown Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, n8n-mcp or gastown?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, n8n-mcp has a trust score of 61.6/100 (C+) while gastown scores 68.5/100 (B-). The 6.9-point difference suggests gastown has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do n8n-mcp and gastown compare on security?
n8n-mcp has a security score of 1/100 and gastown scores 0/100. Both have comparable security profiles. n8n-mcp's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: limited), while gastown's is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal).
Should I use n8n-mcp or gastown?
The choice depends on your requirements. n8n-mcp (devops, 13,805 stars) and gastown (devops, 10,024 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, n8n-mcp scores 61.6/100 and gastown scores 68.5/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 0), and maintenance activity (1 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-05-13 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy