md vs planning-with-files — Trust Score Comparison

Name: md vs planning-with-files Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of md and planning-with-files. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

md scores 56.8/100 (C) while planning-with-files scores 66.0/100 (B-) on the Nerq Trust Score. planning-with-files leads by 9.2 points. md is a productivity agent with 11,801 stars. planning-with-files is a productivity agent with 13,805 stars.

56.8

Categoryproductivity

Stars11,801

Sourcegithub

Security0

Compliance87

Maintenance1

Documentation0

planning-with-files

66.0

B-

Categoryproductivity

Stars13,805

Sourcegithub

Security1

Compliance96

Maintenance1

Documentation1

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	md	planning-with-files
Trust Score	56.8/100	66.0/100
Grade	C	B-
Stars	11,801	13,805
Category	productivity	productivity
Security	0	1
Compliance	87	96
Maintenance	1	1
Documentation	0	1
EU AI Act Risk	minimal	minimal
Verified	No	No

Verdict

planning-with-files leads with a trust score of 66.0/100 compared to md's 56.8/100 (a 9.2-point difference). planning-with-files scores higher on security (1 vs 0), compliance (96 vs 87). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

planning-with-files leads on security with a score of 1/100 compared to md's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

md demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

planning-with-files has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

md has 11,801 GitHub stars while planning-with-files has 13,805. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose md if you need:

More actively maintained with faster release cadence

Choose planning-with-files if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
Larger community (13,805 vs 11,801 stars)
Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from md to planning-with-files (or vice versa)

When migrating between md and planning-with-files, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: md (productivity) and planning-with-files (productivity) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the md safety report and planning-with-files safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: md has 11,801 stars and planning-with-files has 13,805. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

md Safety Report planning-with-files Safety Report md Alternatives planning-with-files Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, md or planning-with-files?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, md has a trust score of 56.8/100 (C) while planning-with-files scores 66.0/100 (B-). The 9.2-point difference suggests planning-with-files has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do md and planning-with-files compare on security?

md has a security score of 0/100 and planning-with-files scores 1/100. Both have comparable security profiles. md's compliance score is 87/100 (EU risk: minimal), while planning-with-files's is 96/100 (EU risk: minimal).

Should I use md or planning-with-files?

The choice depends on your requirements. md (productivity, 11,801 stars) and planning-with-files (productivity, 13,805 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, md scores 56.8/100 and planning-with-files scores 66.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (0 vs 1), and maintenance activity (1 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-05-26 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.