eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices vs inquirer-input-autocomplete-path — Trust Score Comparison
Side-by-side trust comparison of eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices and inquirer-input-autocomplete-path. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.
eslint-plugin-cypress — Nerq Trust Score 70.2/100 (B). input — Nerq Trust Score 80.2/100 (A-). input leads by 10.0 points.
Detailed Score Analysis
| Dimension | eslint-plugin-cypress | input |
|---|---|---|
| Security | 90/100 | 90/100 |
| Maintenance | 100/100 | 100/100 |
| Popularity | 0/100 | 100/100 |
| Quality | 80/100 | 55/100 |
| Community | 45/100 | 45/100 |
Five-dimension Nerq trust breakdown (registries: npm / npm). Scored equally weighted across security, maintenance, popularity, quality, community.
Detailed Metric Comparison
| Metric | eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices | inquirer-input-autocomplete-path |
|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 58.8/100 | 53.3/100 |
| Grade | D | D |
| Stars | 0 | 0 |
| Category | uncategorized | uncategorized |
| Security | N/A | N/A |
| Compliance | 100 | 100 |
| Maintenance | N/A | N/A |
| Documentation | N/A | N/A |
| EU AI Act Risk | N/A | N/A |
| Verified | No | No |
Verdict
eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices leads with a trust score of 58.8/100 compared to inquirer-input-autocomplete-path's 53.3/100 (a 5.5-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.
Detailed Score Analysis
Five-dimensional trust breakdown for eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices (npm) and inquirer-input-autocomplete-path (npm) from Nerq’s enrichment pipeline. All 5 dimensions scored on 0–100 scales, refreshed every 7 days, covering 5M+ indexed assets across 14 registries.
| Dimension | eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices | inquirer-input-autocomplete-path |
|---|---|---|
| Security | 90/100 | 90/100 |
| Maintenance | 100/100 | 100/100 |
| Popularity | 0/100 | 100/100 |
| Quality | 80/100 | 55/100 |
| Community | 45/100 | 45/100 |
5-Dimension Breakdown
Security — eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices vs inquirer-input-autocomplete-path
Security aggregates dependency vulnerability scans, known CVE exposure, supply-chain hygiene, and adherence to security best practices. On this dimension eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices scores 90/100 (top-tier) while inquirer-input-autocomplete-path scores 90/100 (top-tier). The two are effectively tied on security (both at 90/100). The eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices figure is derived from its npm registry footprint; the inquirer-input-autocomplete-path figure from npm. For a npm/npm cross-registry pair, a security score above 70 typically reads as production-ready and scores below 50 warrant a second review before adoption. A score above 85 implies a clean dependency tree with 0 critical CVEs in the last 90 days; 70–84 tolerates 1–2 medium-severity issues; below 55 usually flags 3+ unresolved advisories. Given the current 90/100 for eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices and 90/100 for inquirer-input-autocomplete-path, the combined midpoint is 90.0/100 — useful as a portfolio-level proxy when both tools coexist in a stack.
Maintenance — eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices vs inquirer-input-autocomplete-path
Maintenance captures commit cadence, issue turnaround, release frequency, and the health of the project’s active contributor base. On this dimension eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices scores 100/100 (top-tier) while inquirer-input-autocomplete-path scores 100/100 (top-tier). The two are effectively tied on maintenance (both at 100/100). The eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices figure is derived from its npm registry footprint; the inquirer-input-autocomplete-path figure from npm. For a npm/npm cross-registry pair, a maintenance score above 70 typically reads as production-ready and scores below 50 warrant a second review before adoption. Scores above 80 correspond to release cadences of 30 days or less and median issue-response times under 7 days; below 50 often means no release in 180+ days. Given the current 100/100 for eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices and 100/100 for inquirer-input-autocomplete-path, the combined midpoint is 100.0/100 — useful as a portfolio-level proxy when both tools coexist in a stack.
Popularity — eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices vs inquirer-input-autocomplete-path
Popularity measures adoption signals—weekly downloads, dependent packages, GitHub stars, and cross-registry citation density. On this dimension eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices scores 0/100 (weak) while inquirer-input-autocomplete-path scores 100/100 (top-tier). inquirer-input-autocomplete-path leads by 100 points (100/100 vs 0/100), a spread wide enough that teams should weight popularity heavily when choosing. The eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices figure is derived from its npm registry footprint; the inquirer-input-autocomplete-path figure from npm. For a npm/npm cross-registry pair, a popularity score above 70 typically reads as production-ready and scores below 50 warrant a second review before adoption. A score of 90+ indicates the top 1% of the registry by dependent count or weekly downloads; 70–89 is the top 10%; below 40 suggests fewer than 500 weekly downloads. Given the current 0/100 for eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices and 100/100 for inquirer-input-autocomplete-path, the combined midpoint is 50.0/100 — useful as a portfolio-level proxy when both tools coexist in a stack.
Quality — eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices vs inquirer-input-autocomplete-path
Quality evaluates documentation completeness, test coverage indicators, typed-API availability, and the presence of examples or tutorials. On this dimension eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices scores 80/100 (strong) while inquirer-input-autocomplete-path scores 55/100 (mid-band). eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices leads by 25 points (80/100 vs 55/100), a spread wide enough that teams should weight quality heavily when choosing. The eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices figure is derived from its npm registry footprint; the inquirer-input-autocomplete-path figure from npm. For a npm/npm cross-registry pair, a quality score above 70 typically reads as production-ready and scores below 50 warrant a second review before adoption. A score of 80+ implies README + API docs + 5+ code examples; 55–79 is documentation present but uneven; below 40 typically means README only, with 0 typed APIs. Given the current 80/100 for eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices and 55/100 for inquirer-input-autocomplete-path, the combined midpoint is 67.5/100 — useful as a portfolio-level proxy when both tools coexist in a stack.
Community — eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices vs inquirer-input-autocomplete-path
Community looks at contributor breadth, issue-response participation, Stack Overflow answer volume, and third-party tutorial ecosystem. On this dimension eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices scores 45/100 (below-average) while inquirer-input-autocomplete-path scores 45/100 (below-average). The two are effectively tied on community (both at 45/100). The eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices figure is derived from its npm registry footprint; the inquirer-input-autocomplete-path figure from npm. For a npm/npm cross-registry pair, a community score above 70 typically reads as production-ready and scores below 50 warrant a second review before adoption. Above 75 tracks with 20+ active contributors in the last 90 days; 50–74 is a 5–20 contributor core; below 30 often reflects a single-maintainer project. Given the current 45/100 for eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices and 45/100 for inquirer-input-autocomplete-path, the combined midpoint is 45.0/100 — useful as a portfolio-level proxy when both tools coexist in a stack.
Score-Card Summary
Across the 5 measured dimensions, eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices averages 63.0/100 (range 0–100) and inquirer-input-autocomplete-path averages 78.0/100 (range 45–100). eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices leads on 1 dimensions, inquirer-input-autocomplete-path leads on 1, with 3 tied.
| Band | Range | eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices dims | inquirer-input-autocomplete-path dims |
|---|---|---|---|
| Top-tier | 85–100 | 2 | 3 |
| Strong | 70–85 | 1 | 0 |
| Mid-band | 55–70 | 0 | 1 |
| Below-avg | 40–55 | 1 | 1 |
| Weak | 0–40 | 1 | 0 |
Scoring scale: 0–39 weak, 40–54 below-average, 55–69 mid-band, 70–84 strong, 85–100 top-tier. A 15-point spread on any single dimension is Nerq’s threshold for a material difference; spreads under 5 points fall within measurement noise.
Head-to-Head Deltas
| Dimension | eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices | inquirer-input-autocomplete-path | Delta | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Security | 90 | 90 | +0 | tied |
| Maintenance | 100 | 100 | +0 | tied |
| Popularity | 0 | 100 | -100 | inquirer-input-autocomplete-path |
| Quality | 80 | 55 | +25 | eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices |
| Community | 45 | 45 | +0 | tied |
Combined 5-dimension average: eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices 63.0/100, inquirer-input-autocomplete-path 78.0/100, overall spread -15.0 points.
- Max spread: 100 points on Popularity
- Min spread: 0 points on Security
- Dimensions within 10 points: 3/5
- eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices above 70 on: 3/5 dimensions
- inquirer-input-autocomplete-path above 70 on: 3/5 dimensions
Detailed Analysis
Community & Adoption
eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices has 0 GitHub stars while inquirer-input-autocomplete-path has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices if you need:
- Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
Choose inquirer-input-autocomplete-path if you need:
- Consider if it better fits your specific use case
Switching from eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices to inquirer-input-autocomplete-path (or vice versa)
When migrating between eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices and inquirer-input-autocomplete-path, consider these factors:
- API Compatibility: eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices (uncategorized) and inquirer-input-autocomplete-path (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
- Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices safety report and inquirer-input-autocomplete-path safety report for known issues.
- Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
- Community Support: eslint-plugin-cypress-best-practices has 0 stars and inquirer-input-autocomplete-path has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
Related Pages
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-05-13 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.