extra vs sandboxes — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of extra and sandboxes. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

extra scores 55.0/100 (C) while sandboxes scores 64.2/100 (C+) on the Nerq Trust Score. sandboxes leads by 9.2 points. extra is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars. sandboxes is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars.
55.0
C
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcecrates
Security90
Maintenance50
Documentation40
vs
64.2
C+
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance61
Documentation80

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric extra sandboxes
Trust Score55.0/10064.2/100
GradeCC+
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security9090
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance5061
Documentation4080
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

sandboxes leads with a trust score of 64.2/100 compared to extra's 55.0/100 (a 9.2-point difference). sandboxes scores higher on maintenance (61 vs 50). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

extra leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to sandboxes's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

sandboxes demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (61/100 vs 50/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

sandboxes has better documentation (80/100 vs 40/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

extra has 0 GitHub stars while sandboxes has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose extra if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose sandboxes if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from extra to sandboxes (or vice versa)

When migrating between extra and sandboxes, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: extra (uncategorized) and sandboxes (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the extra safety report and sandboxes safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: extra has 0 stars and sandboxes has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
extra Safety Report sandboxes Safety Report extra Alternatives sandboxes Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, extra or sandboxes?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, extra has a trust score of 55.0/100 (C) while sandboxes scores 64.2/100 (C+). The 9.2-point difference suggests sandboxes has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do extra and sandboxes compare on security?
extra has a security score of 90/100 and sandboxes scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. extra's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while sandboxes's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use extra or sandboxes?
The choice depends on your requirements. extra (uncategorized, 0 stars) and sandboxes (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, extra scores 55.0/100 and sandboxes scores 64.2/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (40 vs 80), and maintenance activity (50 vs 61).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-07-31 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy