core vs query-plan-executor — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of core and query-plan-executor. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

core scores 77.8/100 (B+) while query-plan-executor scores 87.5/100 (A) on the Nerq Trust Score. query-plan-executor leads by 9.7 points. core is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified. query-plan-executor is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified.
77.8
B+ verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance100
Documentation80
vs
87.5
A verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance100
Documentation80

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric core query-plan-executor
Trust Score77.8/10087.5/100
GradeB+A
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security9090
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance100100
Documentation8080
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedYesYes

Verdict

query-plan-executor leads with a trust score of 87.5/100 compared to core's 77.8/100 (a 9.7-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

core leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to query-plan-executor's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

core demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (100/100 vs 100/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

core has better documentation (80/100 vs 80/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

core has 0 GitHub stars while query-plan-executor has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose core if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose query-plan-executor if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Switching from core to query-plan-executor (or vice versa)

When migrating between core and query-plan-executor, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: core (uncategorized) and query-plan-executor (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the core safety report and query-plan-executor safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: core has 0 stars and query-plan-executor has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
core Safety Report query-plan-executor Safety Report core Alternatives query-plan-executor Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, core or query-plan-executor?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, core has a trust score of 77.8/100 (B+) while query-plan-executor scores 87.5/100 (A). The 9.7-point difference suggests query-plan-executor has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do core and query-plan-executor compare on security?
core has a security score of 90/100 and query-plan-executor scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. core's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while query-plan-executor's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use core or query-plan-executor?
The choice depends on your requirements. core (uncategorized, 0 stars) and query-plan-executor (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, core scores 77.8/100 and query-plan-executor scores 87.5/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (80 vs 80), and maintenance activity (100 vs 100).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-08-26 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy