Forkast vs agent-scan — Trust Score Comparison

Name: Forkast vs agent-scan Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of Forkast and agent-scan. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

Forkast scores 60.0/100 (E) while agent-scan scores 0.0/100 (A) on the Nerq Trust Score. Forkast leads by 60.0 points. Forkast is a uncategorized tool with 0 stars. agent-scan is a infrastructure tool with 1,981 stars.

Forkast

60.0

Categoryuncategorized

Stars0

Sourcepulsemcp

agent-scan

0.0

Categoryinfrastructure

Stars1,981

Sourcegithub

Security0

Compliance97

Maintenance1

Documentation1

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	Forkast	agent-scan
Trust Score	60.0/100	0.0/100
Grade	E	A
Stars	0	1,981
Category	uncategorized	infrastructure
Security	N/A	0
Compliance	N/A	97
Maintenance	N/A	1
Documentation	N/A	1
EU AI Act Risk	N/A	N/A
Verified	No	No

Verdict

Forkast leads with a trust score of 60.0/100 compared to agent-scan's 0.0/100 (a 60.0-point difference). However, agent-scan has stronger community adoption (1,981 vs 0 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. Forkast scores N/A and agent-scan scores 0 on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. Forkast: N/A, agent-scan: 1.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. Forkast: N/A, agent-scan: 1.

Community & Adoption

Forkast has 0 GitHub stars while agent-scan has 1,981. agent-scan has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Forkast if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Choose agent-scan if you need:

More actively maintained with faster release cadence
Larger community (1,981 vs 0 stars)
Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from Forkast to agent-scan (or vice versa)

When migrating between Forkast and agent-scan, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: Forkast (uncategorized) and agent-scan (infrastructure) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the Forkast safety report and agent-scan safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: Forkast has 0 stars and agent-scan has 1,981. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

Forkast Safety Report agent-scan Safety Report Forkast Alternatives agent-scan Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, Forkast or agent-scan?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, Forkast has a trust score of 60.0/100 (E) while agent-scan scores 0.0/100 (A). The 60.0-point difference suggests Forkast has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do Forkast and agent-scan compare on security?

Forkast has a security score of N/A/100 and agent-scan scores 0/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. Forkast's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while agent-scan's is 97/100 (EU risk: N/A).

Should I use Forkast or agent-scan?

The choice depends on your requirements. Forkast (uncategorized, 0 stars) and agent-scan (infrastructure, 1,981 stars) serve different use cases. On trust, Forkast scores 60.0/100 and agent-scan scores 0.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (N/A vs 1), and maintenance activity (N/A vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-26 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.