fs-context-mcp-server vs agent-scan — Trust Score Comparison
Side-by-side trust comparison of fs-context-mcp-server and agent-scan. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.
Detailed Metric Comparison
| Metric | fs-context-mcp-server | agent-scan |
|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 63.8/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Grade | D | A |
| Stars | 0 | 1,981 |
| Category | infrastructure | infrastructure |
| Security | 0 | 0 |
| Compliance | 97 | 97 |
| Maintenance | 1 | 1 |
| Documentation | 1 | 1 |
| EU AI Act Risk | minimal | N/A |
| Verified | No | No |
Verdict
fs-context-mcp-server leads with a trust score of 63.8/100 compared to agent-scan's 0.0/100 (a 63.8-point difference). However, agent-scan has stronger community adoption (1,981 vs 0 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.
Detailed Analysis
Security
fs-context-mcp-server leads on security with a score of 0/100 compared to agent-scan's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.
Maintenance & Activity
agent-scan demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.
Documentation
fs-context-mcp-server has better documentation (1/100 vs 1/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.
Community & Adoption
fs-context-mcp-server has 0 GitHub stars while agent-scan has 1,981. agent-scan has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose fs-context-mcp-server if you need:
- Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
Choose agent-scan if you need:
- More actively maintained with faster release cadence
- Larger community (1,981 vs 0 stars)
Switching from fs-context-mcp-server to agent-scan (or vice versa)
When migrating between fs-context-mcp-server and agent-scan, consider these factors:
- API Compatibility: fs-context-mcp-server (infrastructure) and agent-scan (infrastructure) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
- Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the fs-context-mcp-server safety report and agent-scan safety report for known issues.
- Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
- Community Support: fs-context-mcp-server has 0 stars and agent-scan has 1,981. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
Related Pages
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-09-26 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.