fsrs vs crypto-common — Trust Score Comparison
Side-by-side trust comparison of fsrs and crypto-common. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.
Detailed Metric Comparison
| Metric | fsrs | crypto-common |
|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 59.5/100 | 63.2/100 |
| Grade | C | C+ |
| Stars | 0 | 0 |
| Category | uncategorized | uncategorized |
| Security | 90 | 90 |
| Compliance | N/A | N/A |
| Maintenance | 50 | 50 |
| Documentation | 40 | 40 |
| EU AI Act Risk | N/A | N/A |
| Verified | No | No |
Verdict
crypto-common leads with a trust score of 63.2/100 compared to fsrs's 59.5/100 (a 3.7-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.
Detailed Analysis
Security
fsrs leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to crypto-common's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.
Maintenance & Activity
fsrs demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (50/100 vs 50/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.
Documentation
fsrs has better documentation (40/100 vs 40/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.
Community & Adoption
fsrs has 0 GitHub stars while crypto-common has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose fsrs if you need:
- Consider if it better fits your specific use case
Choose crypto-common if you need:
- Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
Switching from fsrs to crypto-common (or vice versa)
When migrating between fsrs and crypto-common, consider these factors:
- API Compatibility: fsrs (uncategorized) and crypto-common (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
- Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the fsrs safety report and crypto-common safety report for known issues.
- Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
- Community Support: fsrs has 0 stars and crypto-common has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
Related Pages
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-10-10 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.