gh-ost vs env_windows_amd64_513 — Trust Score Comparison
Side-by-side trust comparison of gh-ost and env_windows_amd64_513. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.
Detailed Metric Comparison
| Metric | gh-ost | env_windows_amd64_513 |
|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 46.2/100 | 48.2/100 |
| Grade | D | D |
| Stars | 13,276 | 4 |
| Category | uncategorized | uncategorized |
| Security | 90 | 90 |
| Compliance | N/A | N/A |
| Maintenance | 50 | 50 |
| Documentation | 30 | 40 |
| EU AI Act Risk | N/A | N/A |
| Verified | No | No |
Verdict
env_windows_amd64_513 leads with a trust score of 48.2/100 compared to gh-ost's 46.2/100 (a 2.0-point difference). However, gh-ost has stronger community adoption (13,276 vs 4 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.
Detailed Analysis
Security
gh-ost leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to env_windows_amd64_513's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.
Maintenance & Activity
gh-ost demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (50/100 vs 50/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.
Documentation
env_windows_amd64_513 has better documentation (40/100 vs 30/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.
Community & Adoption
gh-ost has 13,276 GitHub stars while env_windows_amd64_513 has 4. gh-ost has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose gh-ost if you need:
- Larger community (13,276 vs 4 stars)
Choose env_windows_amd64_513 if you need:
- Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
- Better documentation for faster onboarding
Switching from gh-ost to env_windows_amd64_513 (or vice versa)
When migrating between gh-ost and env_windows_amd64_513, consider these factors:
- API Compatibility: gh-ost (uncategorized) and env_windows_amd64_513 (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
- Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the gh-ost safety report and env_windows_amd64_513 safety report for known issues.
- Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
- Community Support: gh-ost has 13,276 stars and env_windows_amd64_513 has 4. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
Related Pages
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-07-28 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.