agent-starter-pack vs goshi — Trust Score Comparison

Name: agent-starter-pack vs goshi Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of agent-starter-pack and goshi. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

agent-starter-pack scores 72.0/100 (B) while goshi scores 0.0/100 (D) on the Nerq Trust Score. agent-starter-pack leads by 72.0 points. agent-starter-pack is a devops tool with 5,761 stars, Nerq Verified. goshi is a uncategorized tool with 4 stars.

agent-starter-pack

72.0

B verified

Categorydevops

Stars5,761

Sourcegithub

Security1

Compliance100

Maintenance1

Documentation1

goshi

0.0

Categoryuncategorized

Stars4

Sourcehuggingface_space_full

Compliance100

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	agent-starter-pack	goshi
Trust Score	72.0/100	0.0/100
Grade	B	D
Stars	5,761	4
Category	devops	uncategorized
Security	1	N/A
Compliance	100	100
Maintenance	1	N/A
Documentation	1	N/A
EU AI Act Risk	minimal	N/A
Verified	Yes	No

Verdict

agent-starter-pack leads with a trust score of 72.0/100 compared to goshi's 0.0/100 (a 72.0-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. agent-starter-pack scores 1 and goshi scores N/A on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. agent-starter-pack: 1, goshi: N/A.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. agent-starter-pack: 1, goshi: N/A.

Community & Adoption

agent-starter-pack has 5,761 GitHub stars while goshi has 4. agent-starter-pack has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose agent-starter-pack if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
More actively maintained with faster release cadence
Larger community (5,761 vs 4 stars)
Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose goshi if you need:

Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Switching from agent-starter-pack to goshi (or vice versa)

When migrating between agent-starter-pack and goshi, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: agent-starter-pack (devops) and goshi (uncategorized) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the agent-starter-pack safety report and goshi safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: agent-starter-pack has 5,761 stars and goshi has 4. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

agent-starter-pack Safety Report goshi Safety Report agent-starter-pack Alternatives goshi Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, agent-starter-pack or goshi?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, agent-starter-pack has a trust score of 72.0/100 (B) while goshi scores 0.0/100 (D). The 72.0-point difference suggests agent-starter-pack has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do agent-starter-pack and goshi compare on security?

agent-starter-pack has a security score of 1/100 and goshi scores N/A/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. agent-starter-pack's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: minimal), while goshi's is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A).

Should I use agent-starter-pack or goshi?

The choice depends on your requirements. agent-starter-pack (devops, 5,761 stars) and goshi (uncategorized, 4 stars) serve different use cases. On trust, agent-starter-pack scores 72.0/100 and goshi scores 0.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs N/A), and maintenance activity (1 vs N/A).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-11-12 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.