graph-rag-tiny vs toolhive — Trust Score Comparison

Name: graph-rag-tiny vs toolhive Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of graph-rag-tiny and toolhive. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

graph-rag-tiny scores 67.3/100 (D) while toolhive scores 0.0/100 (A) on the Nerq Trust Score. graph-rag-tiny leads by 67.3 points. graph-rag-tiny is a infrastructure agent with 1 stars. toolhive is a infrastructure agent with 1,610 stars.

graph-rag-tiny

67.3

Categoryinfrastructure

Stars1

Sourcegithub

Security0

Compliance80

Maintenance1

Documentation0

toolhive

0.0

Categoryinfrastructure

Stars1,610

Sourcegithub

Security1

Compliance85

Maintenance1

Documentation1

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	graph-rag-tiny	toolhive
Trust Score	67.3/100	0.0/100
Grade	D	A
Stars	1	1,610
Category	infrastructure	infrastructure
Security	0	1
Compliance	80	85
Maintenance	1	1
Documentation	0	1
EU AI Act Risk	minimal	N/A
Verified	No	No

Verdict

graph-rag-tiny leads with a trust score of 67.3/100 compared to toolhive's 0.0/100 (a 67.3-point difference). However, toolhive has stronger community adoption (1,610 vs 1 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

toolhive leads on security with a score of 1/100 compared to graph-rag-tiny's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

toolhive demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

toolhive has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

graph-rag-tiny has 1 GitHub stars while toolhive has 1,610. toolhive has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose graph-rag-tiny if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Choose toolhive if you need:

Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
More actively maintained with faster release cadence
Larger community (1,610 vs 1 stars)
Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from graph-rag-tiny to toolhive (or vice versa)

When migrating between graph-rag-tiny and toolhive, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: graph-rag-tiny (infrastructure) and toolhive (infrastructure) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the graph-rag-tiny safety report and toolhive safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: graph-rag-tiny has 1 stars and toolhive has 1,610. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

graph-rag-tiny Safety Report toolhive Safety Report graph-rag-tiny Alternatives toolhive Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, graph-rag-tiny or toolhive?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, graph-rag-tiny has a trust score of 67.3/100 (D) while toolhive scores 0.0/100 (A). The 67.3-point difference suggests graph-rag-tiny has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do graph-rag-tiny and toolhive compare on security?

graph-rag-tiny has a security score of 0/100 and toolhive scores 1/100. Both have comparable security profiles. graph-rag-tiny's compliance score is 80/100 (EU risk: minimal), while toolhive's is 85/100 (EU risk: N/A).

Should I use graph-rag-tiny or toolhive?

The choice depends on your requirements. graph-rag-tiny (infrastructure, 1 stars) and toolhive (infrastructure, 1,610 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, graph-rag-tiny scores 67.3/100 and toolhive scores 0.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (0 vs 1), and maintenance activity (1 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-10-26 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.