graphiti vs mage-ai — Trust Score Comparison
Side-by-side trust comparison of graphiti and mage-ai. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.
Detailed Metric Comparison
| Metric | graphiti | mage-ai |
|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 64.8/100 | 69.7/100 |
| Grade | C+ | B- |
| Stars | 22,984 | 8,650 |
| Category | infrastructure | data |
| Security | 0 | 0 |
| Compliance | 100 | 92 |
| Maintenance | 1 | 1 |
| Documentation | 1 | 0 |
| EU AI Act Risk | N/A | minimal |
| Verified | No | No |
Verdict
mage-ai leads with a trust score of 69.7/100 compared to graphiti's 64.8/100 (a 4.9-point difference). However, graphiti has stronger community adoption (22,984 vs 8,650 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.
Detailed Analysis
Security
graphiti leads on security with a score of 0/100 compared to mage-ai's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.
Maintenance & Activity
graphiti demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.
Documentation
graphiti has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.
Community & Adoption
graphiti has 22,984 GitHub stars while mage-ai has 8,650. graphiti has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose graphiti if you need:
- Larger community (22,984 vs 8,650 stars)
- Better documentation for faster onboarding
Choose mage-ai if you need:
- Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
Switching from graphiti to mage-ai (or vice versa)
When migrating between graphiti and mage-ai, consider these factors:
- API Compatibility: graphiti (infrastructure) and mage-ai (data) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
- Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the graphiti safety report and mage-ai safety report for known issues.
- Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
- Community Support: graphiti has 22,984 stars and mage-ai has 8,650. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
Related Pages
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-05-21 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.