ha-addons vs toolhive — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of ha-addons and toolhive. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

ha-addons scores 56.0/100 (C) while toolhive scores 0.0/100 (A) on the Nerq Trust Score. ha-addons leads by 56.0 points. ha-addons is a infrastructure agent with 0 stars. toolhive is a infrastructure agent with 1,610 stars.
56.0
C
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars0
Sourcegithub
Security0
Compliance87
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
0.0
A
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars1,610
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance85
Maintenance1
Documentation1

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric ha-addons toolhive
Trust Score56.0/1000.0/100
GradeCA
Stars01,610
Categoryinfrastructureinfrastructure
Security01
Compliance8785
Maintenance11
Documentation11
EU AI Act RiskminimalN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

ha-addons leads with a trust score of 56.0/100 compared to toolhive's 0.0/100 (a 56.0-point difference). ha-addons scores higher on compliance (87 vs 85). However, toolhive has stronger community adoption (1,610 vs 0 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

toolhive leads on security with a score of 1/100 compared to ha-addons's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

toolhive demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

toolhive has better documentation (1/100 vs 1/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

ha-addons has 0 GitHub stars while toolhive has 1,610. toolhive has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose ha-addons if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Choose toolhive if you need:

  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (1,610 vs 0 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from ha-addons to toolhive (or vice versa)

When migrating between ha-addons and toolhive, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: ha-addons (infrastructure) and toolhive (infrastructure) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the ha-addons safety report and toolhive safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: ha-addons has 0 stars and toolhive has 1,610. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
ha-addons Safety Report toolhive Safety Report ha-addons Alternatives toolhive Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, ha-addons or toolhive?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, ha-addons has a trust score of 56.0/100 (C) while toolhive scores 0.0/100 (A). The 56.0-point difference suggests ha-addons has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do ha-addons and toolhive compare on security?
ha-addons has a security score of 0/100 and toolhive scores 1/100. Both have comparable security profiles. ha-addons's compliance score is 87/100 (EU risk: minimal), while toolhive's is 85/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use ha-addons or toolhive?
The choice depends on your requirements. ha-addons (infrastructure, 0 stars) and toolhive (infrastructure, 1,610 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, ha-addons scores 56.0/100 and toolhive scores 0.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 1), and maintenance activity (1 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-11-02 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy