proxy4agents-mcp vs toolhive — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of proxy4agents-mcp and toolhive. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

proxy4agents-mcp scores 65.2/100 (E) while toolhive scores 0.0/100 (A) on the Nerq Trust Score. proxy4agents-mcp leads by 65.2 points. proxy4agents-mcp is a uncategorized tool with 0 stars. toolhive is a infrastructure tool with 1,610 stars.
65.2
E
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcemcp_registry
vs
0.0
A
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars1,610
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance85
Maintenance1
Documentation1

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric proxy4agents-mcp toolhive
Trust Score65.2/1000.0/100
GradeEA
Stars01,610
Categoryuncategorizedinfrastructure
SecurityN/A1
ComplianceN/A85
MaintenanceN/A1
DocumentationN/A1
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

proxy4agents-mcp leads with a trust score of 65.2/100 compared to toolhive's 0.0/100 (a 65.2-point difference). However, toolhive has stronger community adoption (1,610 vs 0 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. proxy4agents-mcp scores N/A and toolhive scores 1 on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. proxy4agents-mcp: N/A, toolhive: 1.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. proxy4agents-mcp: N/A, toolhive: 1.

Community & Adoption

proxy4agents-mcp has 0 GitHub stars while toolhive has 1,610. toolhive has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose proxy4agents-mcp if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Choose toolhive if you need:

  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (1,610 vs 0 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from proxy4agents-mcp to toolhive (or vice versa)

When migrating between proxy4agents-mcp and toolhive, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: proxy4agents-mcp (uncategorized) and toolhive (infrastructure) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the proxy4agents-mcp safety report and toolhive safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: proxy4agents-mcp has 0 stars and toolhive has 1,610. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
proxy4agents-mcp Safety Report toolhive Safety Report proxy4agents-mcp Alternatives toolhive Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, proxy4agents-mcp or toolhive?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, proxy4agents-mcp has a trust score of 65.2/100 (E) while toolhive scores 0.0/100 (A). The 65.2-point difference suggests proxy4agents-mcp has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do proxy4agents-mcp and toolhive compare on security?
proxy4agents-mcp has a security score of N/A/100 and toolhive scores 1/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. proxy4agents-mcp's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while toolhive's is 85/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use proxy4agents-mcp or toolhive?
The choice depends on your requirements. proxy4agents-mcp (uncategorized, 0 stars) and toolhive (infrastructure, 1,610 stars) serve different use cases. On trust, proxy4agents-mcp scores 65.2/100 and toolhive scores 0.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (N/A vs 1), and maintenance activity (N/A vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-11-08 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy