judgeval vs hapi — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of judgeval and hapi. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

judgeval scores 75.5/100 (B+) while hapi scores 85.5/100 (A) on the Nerq Trust Score. hapi leads by 10.0 points. judgeval is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified. hapi is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified.
75.5
B+ verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance94
Documentation80
vs
85.5
A verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance100
Documentation70

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric judgeval hapi
Trust Score75.5/10085.5/100
GradeB+A
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security9090
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance94100
Documentation8070
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedYesYes

Verdict

hapi leads with a trust score of 85.5/100 compared to judgeval's 75.5/100 (a 10.0-point difference). hapi scores higher on maintenance (100 vs 94). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

judgeval leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to hapi's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

hapi demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (100/100 vs 94/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

judgeval has better documentation (80/100 vs 70/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

judgeval has 0 GitHub stars while hapi has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose judgeval if you need:

  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose hapi if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence

Switching from judgeval to hapi (or vice versa)

When migrating between judgeval and hapi, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: judgeval (uncategorized) and hapi (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the judgeval safety report and hapi safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: judgeval has 0 stars and hapi has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
judgeval Safety Report hapi Safety Report judgeval Alternatives hapi Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, judgeval or hapi?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, judgeval has a trust score of 75.5/100 (B+) while hapi scores 85.5/100 (A). The 10.0-point difference suggests hapi has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do judgeval and hapi compare on security?
judgeval has a security score of 90/100 and hapi scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. judgeval's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while hapi's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use judgeval or hapi?
The choice depends on your requirements. judgeval (uncategorized, 0 stars) and hapi (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, judgeval scores 75.5/100 and hapi scores 85.5/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (80 vs 70), and maintenance activity (94 vs 100).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-09-18 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy