koa-proxy vs eslint-plugin-graphql — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of koa-proxy and eslint-plugin-graphql. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

koa-proxy scores 0.0/100 (D) while eslint-plugin-graphql scores 65.2/100 (B-) on the Nerq Trust Score. eslint-plugin-graphql leads by 65.2 points. koa-proxy is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars. eslint-plugin-graphql is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars.
0.0
D
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm_full
Compliance100
vs
65.2
B-
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance94
Documentation55

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric koa-proxy eslint-plugin-graphql
Trust Score0.0/10065.2/100
GradeDB-
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
SecurityN/A90
Compliance100N/A
MaintenanceN/A94
DocumentationN/A55
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

eslint-plugin-graphql leads with a trust score of 65.2/100 compared to koa-proxy's 0.0/100 (a 65.2-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. koa-proxy scores N/A and eslint-plugin-graphql scores 90 on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. koa-proxy: N/A, eslint-plugin-graphql: 94.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. koa-proxy: N/A, eslint-plugin-graphql: 55.

Community & Adoption

koa-proxy has 0 GitHub stars while eslint-plugin-graphql has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose koa-proxy if you need:

  • Consider if it better fits your specific use case

Choose eslint-plugin-graphql if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from koa-proxy to eslint-plugin-graphql (or vice versa)

When migrating between koa-proxy and eslint-plugin-graphql, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: koa-proxy (uncategorized) and eslint-plugin-graphql (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the koa-proxy safety report and eslint-plugin-graphql safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: koa-proxy has 0 stars and eslint-plugin-graphql has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
koa-proxy Safety Report eslint-plugin-graphql Safety Report koa-proxy Alternatives eslint-plugin-graphql Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, koa-proxy or eslint-plugin-graphql?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, koa-proxy has a trust score of 0.0/100 (D) while eslint-plugin-graphql scores 65.2/100 (B-). The 65.2-point difference suggests eslint-plugin-graphql has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do koa-proxy and eslint-plugin-graphql compare on security?
koa-proxy has a security score of N/A/100 and eslint-plugin-graphql scores 90/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. koa-proxy's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A), while eslint-plugin-graphql's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use koa-proxy or eslint-plugin-graphql?
The choice depends on your requirements. koa-proxy (uncategorized, 0 stars) and eslint-plugin-graphql (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, koa-proxy scores 0.0/100 and eslint-plugin-graphql scores 65.2/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (N/A vs 55), and maintenance activity (N/A vs 94).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-07-31 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy