FastGPT vs langflow — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of FastGPT and langflow. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

FastGPT scores 67.0/100 (B-) while langflow scores 66.1/100 (B-) on the Nerq Trust Score. The two agents are essentially tied on overall trust. FastGPT is a infrastructure agent with 27,144 stars. langflow is a infrastructure agent with 145,358 stars.
67.0
B-
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars27,144
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance100
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
66.1
B-
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars145,358
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance87
Maintenance1
Documentation1

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric FastGPT langflow
Trust Score67.0/10066.1/100
GradeB-B-
Stars27,144145,358
Categoryinfrastructureinfrastructure
Security11
Compliance10087
Maintenance11
Documentation11
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

FastGPT (67.0) and langflow (66.1) have nearly identical trust scores. Both are solid choices. The decision should come down to your specific use case, team preferences, and integration requirements rather than trust differences.

Detailed Analysis

Security

FastGPT leads on security with a score of 1/100 compared to langflow's 1/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

FastGPT demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

FastGPT has better documentation (1/100 vs 1/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

FastGPT has 27,144 GitHub stars while langflow has 145,358. langflow has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose FastGPT if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Choose langflow if you need:

  • Larger community (145,358 vs 27,144 stars)

Switching from FastGPT to langflow (or vice versa)

When migrating between FastGPT and langflow, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: FastGPT (infrastructure) and langflow (infrastructure) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the FastGPT safety report and langflow safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: FastGPT has 27,144 stars and langflow has 145,358. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
FastGPT Safety Report langflow Safety Report FastGPT Alternatives langflow Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, FastGPT or langflow?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, FastGPT has a trust score of 67.0/100 (B-) while langflow scores 66.1/100 (B-). Both agents are very close in overall trust. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do FastGPT and langflow compare on security?
FastGPT has a security score of 1/100 and langflow scores 1/100. Both have comparable security profiles. FastGPT's compliance score is 100/100 (EU risk: N/A), while langflow's is 87/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use FastGPT or langflow?
The choice depends on your requirements. FastGPT (infrastructure, 27,144 stars) and langflow (infrastructure, 145,358 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, FastGPT scores 67.0/100 and langflow scores 66.1/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 1), and maintenance activity (1 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-05-26 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy