Open-Assistant vs ten-framework — Trust Score Comparison

Name: Open-Assistant vs ten-framework Trust Comparison
Creator: Nerq

Side-by-side trust comparison of Open-Assistant and ten-framework. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

Open-Assistant scores 67.9/100 (B-) while ten-framework scores 64.7/100 (C+) on the Nerq Trust Score. Open-Assistant leads by 3.2 points. Open-Assistant is a communication agent with 37,449 stars. ten-framework is a communication agent with 10,231 stars.

Open-Assistant

67.9

B-

Categorycommunication

Stars37,449

Sourcegithub

Security0

Compliance73

Maintenance1

Documentation0

ten-framework

64.7

C+

Categorycommunication

Stars10,231

Sourcegithub

Security1

Compliance82

Maintenance1

Documentation1

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric	Open-Assistant	ten-framework
Trust Score	67.9/100	64.7/100
Grade	B-	C+
Stars	37,449	10,231
Category	communication	communication
Security	0	1
Compliance	73	82
Maintenance	1	1
Documentation	0	1
EU AI Act Risk	minimal	N/A
Verified	No	No

Verdict

Open-Assistant leads with a trust score of 67.9/100 compared to ten-framework's 64.7/100 (a 3.2-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

ten-framework leads on security with a score of 1/100 compared to Open-Assistant's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

Open-Assistant demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

ten-framework has better documentation (1/100 vs 0/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

Open-Assistant has 37,449 GitHub stars while ten-framework has 10,231. Open-Assistant has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose Open-Assistant if you need:

Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
Larger community (37,449 vs 10,231 stars)

Choose ten-framework if you need:

Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from Open-Assistant to ten-framework (or vice versa)

When migrating between Open-Assistant and ten-framework, consider these factors:

API Compatibility: Open-Assistant (communication) and ten-framework (communication) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the Open-Assistant safety report and ten-framework safety report for known issues.
Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
Community Support: Open-Assistant has 37,449 stars and ten-framework has 10,231. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.

Open-Assistant Safety Report ten-framework Safety Report Open-Assistant Alternatives ten-framework Alternatives

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, Open-Assistant or ten-framework?

Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, Open-Assistant has a trust score of 67.9/100 (B-) while ten-framework scores 64.7/100 (C+). The 3.2-point difference suggests Open-Assistant has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.

How do Open-Assistant and ten-framework compare on security?

Open-Assistant has a security score of 0/100 and ten-framework scores 1/100. Both have comparable security profiles. Open-Assistant's compliance score is 73/100 (EU risk: minimal), while ten-framework's is 82/100 (EU risk: N/A).

Should I use Open-Assistant or ten-framework?

The choice depends on your requirements. Open-Assistant (communication, 37,449 stars) and ten-framework (communication, 10,231 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, Open-Assistant scores 67.9/100 and ten-framework scores 64.7/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (0 vs 1), and maintenance activity (1 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-05-26 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.