auth vs icons — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of auth and icons. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

auth scores 68.2/100 (B-) while icons scores 78.2/100 (B+) on the Nerq Trust Score. icons leads by 10.0 points. auth is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars. icons is a uncategorized agent with 0 stars, Nerq Verified.
68.2
B-
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance89
Documentation65
vs
78.2
B+ verified
Categoryuncategorized
Stars0
Sourcenpm
Security90
Maintenance77
Documentation70

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric auth icons
Trust Score68.2/10078.2/100
GradeB-B+
Stars00
Categoryuncategorizeduncategorized
Security9090
ComplianceN/AN/A
Maintenance8977
Documentation6570
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoYes

Verdict

icons leads with a trust score of 78.2/100 compared to auth's 68.2/100 (a 10.0-point difference). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

auth leads on security with a score of 90/100 compared to icons's 90/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

auth demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (89/100 vs 77/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

icons has better documentation (70/100 vs 65/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

auth has 0 GitHub stars while icons has 0. Both tools have comparable community sizes, suggesting similar levels of ecosystem support and third-party resources.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose auth if you need:

  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence

Choose icons if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from auth to icons (or vice versa)

When migrating between auth and icons, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: auth (uncategorized) and icons (uncategorized) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the auth safety report and icons safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: auth has 0 stars and icons has 0. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
auth Safety Report icons Safety Report auth Alternatives icons Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, auth or icons?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, auth has a trust score of 68.2/100 (B-) while icons scores 78.2/100 (B+). The 10.0-point difference suggests icons has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do auth and icons compare on security?
auth has a security score of 90/100 and icons scores 90/100. Both have comparable security profiles. auth's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while icons's is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use auth or icons?
The choice depends on your requirements. auth (uncategorized, 0 stars) and icons (uncategorized, 0 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, auth scores 68.2/100 and icons scores 78.2/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (65 vs 70), and maintenance activity (89 vs 77).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-10-20 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy