MCP Memory Gateway vs toolhive — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of MCP Memory Gateway and toolhive. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

MCP Memory Gateway scores 63.5/100 (E) while toolhive scores 0.0/100 (A) on the Nerq Trust Score. MCP Memory Gateway leads by 63.5 points. MCP Memory Gateway is a uncategorized tool with 7 stars. toolhive is a infrastructure tool with 1,610 stars.
63.5
E
Categoryuncategorized
Stars7
Sourcepulsemcp
vs
0.0
A
Categoryinfrastructure
Stars1,610
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance85
Maintenance1
Documentation1

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric MCP Memory Gateway toolhive
Trust Score63.5/1000.0/100
GradeEA
Stars71,610
Categoryuncategorizedinfrastructure
SecurityN/A1
ComplianceN/A85
MaintenanceN/A1
DocumentationN/A1
EU AI Act RiskN/AN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

MCP Memory Gateway leads with a trust score of 63.5/100 compared to toolhive's 0.0/100 (a 63.5-point difference). However, toolhive has stronger community adoption (1,610 vs 7 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

Security scores measure dependency vulnerabilities, CVE exposure, and security practices. MCP Memory Gateway scores N/A and toolhive scores 1 on this dimension.

Maintenance & Activity

Activity scores reflect how actively each project is maintained. MCP Memory Gateway: N/A, toolhive: 1.

Documentation

Documentation quality is evaluated based on README, API docs, and example coverage. MCP Memory Gateway: N/A, toolhive: 1.

Community & Adoption

MCP Memory Gateway has 7 GitHub stars while toolhive has 1,610. toolhive has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose MCP Memory Gateway if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use

Choose toolhive if you need:

  • Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
  • More actively maintained with faster release cadence
  • Larger community (1,610 vs 7 stars)
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Switching from MCP Memory Gateway to toolhive (or vice versa)

When migrating between MCP Memory Gateway and toolhive, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: MCP Memory Gateway (uncategorized) and toolhive (infrastructure) serve different categories, so migration may require significant refactoring.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the MCP Memory Gateway safety report and toolhive safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: MCP Memory Gateway has 7 stars and toolhive has 1,610. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
MCP Memory Gateway Safety Report toolhive Safety Report MCP Memory Gateway Alternatives toolhive Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, MCP Memory Gateway or toolhive?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, MCP Memory Gateway has a trust score of 63.5/100 (E) while toolhive scores 0.0/100 (A). The 63.5-point difference suggests MCP Memory Gateway has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do MCP Memory Gateway and toolhive compare on security?
MCP Memory Gateway has a security score of N/A/100 and toolhive scores 1/100. There is a notable difference in their security assessments. MCP Memory Gateway's compliance score is N/A/100 (EU risk: N/A), while toolhive's is 85/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use MCP Memory Gateway or toolhive?
The choice depends on your requirements. MCP Memory Gateway (uncategorized, 7 stars) and toolhive (infrastructure, 1,610 stars) serve different use cases. On trust, MCP Memory Gateway scores 63.5/100 and toolhive scores 0.0/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (N/A vs 1), and maintenance activity (N/A vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-11-04 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy