mcp-scan vs opencngsm-mcp — Trust Score Comparison
Side-by-side trust comparison of mcp-scan and opencngsm-mcp. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.
Detailed Metric Comparison
| Metric | mcp-scan | opencngsm-mcp |
|---|---|---|
| Trust Score | 0.0/100 | 72.0/100 |
| Grade | B | C |
| Stars | 1,460 | 1 |
| Category | security | security |
| Security | 1 | 0 |
| Compliance | 97 | 60 |
| Maintenance | 1 | 1 |
| Documentation | 1 | 1 |
| EU AI Act Risk | N/A | minimal |
| Verified | No | Yes |
Verdict
opencngsm-mcp leads with a trust score of 72.0/100 compared to mcp-scan's 0.0/100 (a 72.0-point difference). opencngsm-mcp scores higher on maintenance (1 vs 1). However, mcp-scan has stronger community adoption (1,460 vs 1 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.
Detailed Analysis
Security
mcp-scan leads on security with a score of 1/100 compared to opencngsm-mcp's 0/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.
Maintenance & Activity
opencngsm-mcp demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.
Documentation
mcp-scan has better documentation (1/100 vs 1/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.
Community & Adoption
mcp-scan has 1,460 GitHub stars while opencngsm-mcp has 1. mcp-scan has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.
When to Choose Each Tool
Choose mcp-scan if you need:
- Stronger security profile with fewer known vulnerabilities
- Larger community (1,460 vs 1 stars)
- Better documentation for faster onboarding
Choose opencngsm-mcp if you need:
- Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
- More actively maintained with faster release cadence
Switching from mcp-scan to opencngsm-mcp (or vice versa)
When migrating between mcp-scan and opencngsm-mcp, consider these factors:
- API Compatibility: mcp-scan (security) and opencngsm-mcp (security) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
- Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the mcp-scan safety report and opencngsm-mcp safety report for known issues.
- Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
- Community Support: mcp-scan has 1,460 stars and opencngsm-mcp has 1. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
Related Pages
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Last updated: 2026-09-22 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.