mcp-scanner vs pentagi — Trust Score Comparison

Side-by-side trust comparison of mcp-scanner and pentagi. Scores based on security, compliance, maintenance, popularity, and ecosystem signals.

mcp-scanner scores 66.2/100 (B-) while pentagi scores 63.6/100 (C+) on the Nerq Trust Score. mcp-scanner leads by 2.6 points. mcp-scanner is a security agent with 809 stars. pentagi is a security agent with 7,264 stars.
66.2
B-
Categorysecurity
Stars809
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance77
Maintenance1
Documentation1
vs
63.6
C+
Categorysecurity
Stars7,264
Sourcegithub
Security1
Compliance97
Maintenance1
Documentation1

Detailed Metric Comparison

Metric mcp-scanner pentagi
Trust Score66.2/10063.6/100
GradeB-C+
Stars8097,264
Categorysecuritysecurity
Security11
Compliance7797
Maintenance11
Documentation11
EU AI Act RiskminimalN/A
VerifiedNoNo

Verdict

mcp-scanner leads with a trust score of 66.2/100 compared to pentagi's 63.6/100 (a 2.6-point difference). However, pentagi has stronger community adoption (7,264 vs 809 stars). Both agents should be evaluated based on your specific requirements.

Detailed Analysis

Security

mcp-scanner leads on security with a score of 1/100 compared to pentagi's 1/100. This score reflects dependency vulnerability analysis, known CVE exposure, and security best practices. A higher security score means fewer known vulnerabilities and better security hygiene in the codebase.

Maintenance & Activity

mcp-scanner demonstrates stronger maintenance activity (1/100 vs 1/100). This metric captures commit frequency, issue response times, and release cadence. Actively maintained tools receive faster security patches and are less likely to accumulate technical debt.

Documentation

mcp-scanner has better documentation (1/100 vs 1/100). Good documentation reduces onboarding time and helps teams adopt the tool safely. This score evaluates README completeness, API documentation, code examples, and tutorial availability.

Community & Adoption

mcp-scanner has 809 GitHub stars while pentagi has 7,264. pentagi has significantly broader community adoption, which typically means more Stack Overflow answers, more third-party tutorials, and faster ecosystem development.

When to Choose Each Tool

Choose mcp-scanner if you need:

  • Higher overall trust score — more reliable for production use
  • Better documentation for faster onboarding

Choose pentagi if you need:

  • Larger community (7,264 vs 809 stars)

Switching from mcp-scanner to pentagi (or vice versa)

When migrating between mcp-scanner and pentagi, consider these factors:

  1. API Compatibility: mcp-scanner (security) and pentagi (security) share similar interfaces since they are in the same category.
  2. Security Review: Run a security audit after migration. Check the mcp-scanner safety report and pentagi safety report for known issues.
  3. Testing: Ensure your test suite covers all integration points before switching in production.
  4. Community Support: mcp-scanner has 809 stars and pentagi has 7,264. Larger communities typically mean better Stack Overflow answers and migration guides.
mcp-scanner Safety Report pentagi Safety Report mcp-scanner Alternatives pentagi Alternatives

Related Pages

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is safer, mcp-scanner or pentagi?
Based on Nerq's independent trust assessment, mcp-scanner has a trust score of 66.2/100 (B-) while pentagi scores 63.6/100 (C+). The 2.6-point difference suggests mcp-scanner has a stronger trust profile. Trust scores are based on security, compliance, maintenance, documentation, and community adoption.
How do mcp-scanner and pentagi compare on security?
mcp-scanner has a security score of 1/100 and pentagi scores 1/100. Both have comparable security profiles. mcp-scanner's compliance score is 77/100 (EU risk: minimal), while pentagi's is 97/100 (EU risk: N/A).
Should I use mcp-scanner or pentagi?
The choice depends on your requirements. mcp-scanner (security, 809 stars) and pentagi (security, 7,264 stars) serve similar use cases. On trust, mcp-scanner scores 66.2/100 and pentagi scores 63.6/100. Review the full KYA reports for each agent before making a decision. Consider factors like integration requirements, documentation quality (1 vs 1), and maintenance activity (1 vs 1).

Related Comparisons

Last updated: 2026-04-28 | Data refreshed weekly
Disclaimer: Nerq trust scores are automated assessments based on publicly available signals. They are not endorsements or guarantees. Always conduct your own due diligence.

We use cookies for analytics and caching. Privacy Policy